User talk:Inhwiki2

Please just stop

OK, you've admitted sockpuppetry using User:RegencyPost to affect the voting on your article. You admit that you've used this new account to get round a user ban. Now you are not appealing the ban in any effective way, you are instead just striking through any votes that you disagree with. I have tried to assume good faith, but this is simply unacceptable behavior on wikipedia. I asked you previously to have a think about how to achieve your objectives with the consent and support of the wikipedia community, and you seem to have failed to do so. I ask you to stop before you damage your own reputation and that of Sacred Gin any further. TrulyBlue (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Inhwiki2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. TrulyBlue (talk) 12:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refactoring others' comments

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Gin, you will be blocked for vandalism. Deor (talk) 13:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

If you think that you have been blocked unjustly, the thing to do is to add the {{unblock}} template to the bottom of the talk page of your original account (User:Inhwiki), filling in the reason why you think you should be unblocked. An adminstrator will then review your request and take appropriate action. If the existence of this block-evading account (and any others you may create) comes to the attention of an administrator, it will be blocked as a matter of course, since the creation of new accounts to get around blocks is forbidden. Deor (talk) 14:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]