User talk:Ingy Gafaar

This is Ingy Gafaar's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarek Youssef (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Spam.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarek Youssef and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 09:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ingy Gafaar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 09:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tarek Youssef

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tarek Youssef, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Maliner (talk) 09:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jimfbleak please tell me what to do to get unblocked and why is this considered an advertising only account? it is a biography Ingy Gafaar (talk) 11:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ingy Gafaar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please tell me what to do to get unblocked and why is this considered an advertising only account? it is a biography Ingy Gafaar (talk) 11:39, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It was blatantly promotional, a clear violation of WP:PROMO. It would have been eye-rollingly promotional on a marketing website and is completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ingy Gafaar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the WP:PROMO and now I completely understand the reason i got blocked. can you please remove my block and i will write a new biography that abides by the rules of WP Ingy Gafaar (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We won't waste your and our time by unblocking you to attempt to do something you will most likely fail at. Writing a new article is the most difficult task to perform on Wikipedia even without a conflict of interest, it's harder with one. We're going to need to see an edit history from you of edits in topic areas for which you have no conflict of interest, as a demonstration of your understanding of relevant Wikipedia policies first. Writing a new article is not the only or even best way to contribute. We have millions of articles that need work. You won't be unblocked to, anytime soon, write about topics for which you have a conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 11:49, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You will not be unblocked to write a promo for Tarek Youssef again. If you want to write about something else, tell us what that is Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

its going to be a biography piece and i checked the correct way to write it without any promotion and of course you can review it before it gets published and you can either reject it or approve it. at the end of the day you will get to review what i write. Ingy Gafaar (talk) 09:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. --Yamla (talk) 10:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]