User talk:Infovalley

Welcome

Hello Infovalley, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Infovalley, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 04:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Infovalley/sandbox (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infovalley/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 11:29, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with the second (amended) article that I submitted in October 2014. I have yet to receive any feedback on the submission and would like to know the status.

Infovalley (talk) 01:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC) Nor Izmawati Mostapar[reply]

For all I can tell you did not submit an amended draft for a new review, but added what looks to me like an identical copy, including a copy of the original draft's review and the reviewer's comments. While I haven't made a detailed comparison to check whether some details may have changed, what definitely has not changed between the drafts is the referencing that would need to be improved. (In particular, Wikipedia does not consider itself a reliable source; other references don't so much as mention digital autopsies. The tone also is highly problematic and at times reads like purple prose. You should edit the sandbox and make sure that only one updated draft is presented that addresses the issues found in the last review. What you should keep is one of the old "submission declined" message boxes, both because it will serve as a historical record of past issues until the draft is accepted, making future reviews a little easier, and because it has the button to submit the draft for a new review. Huon (talk) 01:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Infovalley/sandbox

Hello, Infovalley. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Infovalley/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infovalley/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per this, it looks like Infovalley is the name of a company that offers this service. You've only edited in your userspace, which is very good, but your username is still problematic. You'll need to change this in order to edit but you also need to disclose your COI somewhere, preferably on your userpage since that way it can be easily seen. Assuming that the sandbox article isn't over the top promotional, I have no true issue with unblocking you and restoring the content, but I would highly recommend that you get someone from WP:TEAHOUSE to help you through the editing process. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I looked through the article and it has some definite promotional overtones. What made me decide not to restore it is specifically this sentence:

"Therefore Pathologists, especially Forensic Pathologists are able to explore a deceased body without the hassles of time consuming procedure of conventional autopsy."

The article has many things along these lines but this was a bit too much. The thing to remember about writing articles on Wikipedia is that the articles should not read like an endorsement of the topic. This can be difficult to do for someone who has a conflict of interest, especially if you have a background in marketing/PR and are used to writing in this manner. I'd recommend that you re-write it and that you get someone to help you with this process, preferably someone on Wikipedia that's used to editing and writing. You can get a mentor through several different avenues listed at WP:MENTOR. I still don't have a problem with unblocking you since you didn't make these edits in the mainspace. Also, I was going to e-mail you a copy but there's a far more neutral version of the article at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infovalley/sandbox, so you can work on that version there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt reply. I would be grateful if you can clarify your points to help me amend the article for successful publishing. You mentioned the username of "Infovalley" is problematic, should I change the username? Or I have to create a new username? I did not appreciate the "COI" that I have to disclose, would you please explain more? For mentioned promotional overtone for better understanding the following sentence is better than the above one:

"Therefore, pathologists, especially forensic pathologist, might explore the deceased body faster than conventional procedure of autopsy"

Then I would be able to ask for help on editing from the TeaHouse more efficiently. I believe any copy (sample) that you would send, will be very helpful to make it compatible with Wikipedia framework. Infovalley (talk) 06:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infovalley/sandbox concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infovalley/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digital Autopsy

Hello, Infovalley. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Digital Autopsy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]