User talk:InformativeMind

globally renamed RealLifeMusicLLC to InformativeMind

globally renamed RealLifeMusicLLC to InformativeMind --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:NoxBond, from its old location at User:InformativeMind/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 02:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NoxBond (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NoxBond and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NoxBond, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InformativeMind! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InformativeMind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know we couldn't have our company name as a user name. NoxBond is a valid candidate for Wikipedia seeing as he is a recognized FreeMason There is no advertisement. NoxBond is a freemason and a music executive. I will take out the personal information and try again, but there is no product or service being advertised it is simply a biography. I would argue that owning 50 record labels, even if they are independant record labels, is notable.

Decline reason:

That may be, but this does not explain your understanding of conflict of interest and paid editing, nor what you will edit about as you won't be unblocked to, in the short term, make conflict of interest related edits.

If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 06:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InformativeMind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am being told excuse after excuse why I can not have a wikipedia page. I understand there is a COI rule that typically prevents people from posting about their self or other people close to them, but it does not explicitly state it can not be done. This is NOT paid, and it is NOT advertisement. it is My Life!! I am NoxBond. I am notable. I own 50 record labels, that in and of itself is a notable feat even if they are independent labels. I own a DJ Coalition with 700 members in it. I have millions of streams online, and this is all verifiable. I am also a 32° FreeMason with recognition from the Grand Lodge of Kansas, which ALONE should make me someone worthy of wikipedia. When I want something done, I do it myself. I have done this through the correct protocol of wikipedia and painstakingly notated over 30 resources. Please be fair and allow me to have a wikipedia page. All of my claims are proven. It would not hurt anyone for me to be able to feel good about my endeavors.

Decline reason:

You clearly violated WP:COI. For example, you failed to disclose your conflict of interest, violating WP:COI and WP:PAID. You violated our Terms of Use. You violated WP:AUTOBIO. You won't be unblocked to write about yourself or anything else for which you have a conflict of interest. Even if you didn't have a conflict of interest, even if you weren't writing about yourself, Draft:NoxBond is nowhere near appropriate for a Wikipedia article. Yamla (talk) 10:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InformativeMind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You guys are great.. So Mote It Be. Then go ahead and take down a note, I do not give my permission for you to go back and later make a wikipedia page for me when I don't need you. at this point you are not alllowed to post anything about NoxBond no matter his level of fame. and thanks so much for not helping.

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. You cannot grant or deny permission for there to be a Wikipedia article (not a mere "page") about you. Should there be significant coverage of you in independent reliable sources showing how you meet notability guidelines, an independent editor can choose to write about you. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:NoxBond

Hello, InformativeMind. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NoxBond, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NoxBond

Hello, InformativeMind. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "NoxBond".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]