User talk:Information technology +

December 2017

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:JesusorAllah that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, hope this finds you in the best of health. He was not here to contribute and was clearly guilty of vandalism. I've dealt with people like him before and couldn't be asked engaging with him. His account was made for the slecific vandalism of that page. But I do note your sincere efforts of collaboration and understanding. So yeah - thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Information technology + (talk • contribs) 02:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you insulted them and questioned their mental abilities, and even if they were a vandal, there was no excuse for that. C.Fred, you are again proven to be friendlier and more diplomatic than me. Which reminds me, Information technology: one account per person. I strongly suggest you explain what the other account is for, and that you close it or something, with a "retired" sticker on it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:56, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred and I have already discussed this in an appropriate manner. So there's no need for you to be on this thread. The incident is done with. But yeah, I love you too.

June 2018

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How was that a spam. I added a legitimate opinion by a recognised scholar, who us the head of a theological school and referenced it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Information technology + (talk • contribs) 15:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Information technology +. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]