User talk:Infoman182

Infoman182, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Infoman182! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

December 2018

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Icewhiz (talk) 12:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPA

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.Icewhiz (talk) 12:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--

is this supposed to scare me? i've been monitoring your edits for the last few months now, and it's quite obvious that you have extremely pro-israel and anti-polish agendas, among others. i'm also quite certain you're being employed by an israeli equivalent to the russian troll farms whom spend their days sewing seeds of doubt and malice. i question what exactly you're trying to accomplish, and although i can inductively reason a few goals that you're trying to achieve, i'd rather just stay in the realm of the deductive i mentioned above.

it also doesn't surprise me that your M.O. is to also quickly copy/paste some scary block of text in an attempt to run-off any new editors. you did this virtually instantly!

i won't be bullied by you. Infoman182 (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We've interacted before? Where specifically? Icewhiz (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--

we've never interacted, but I have been keeping an eye on polish related articles for the past year, and every time there's a disagreement or edit warring over the muddying of waters with long established information, whether it be adding anti-polish stuff or removing pro-polish stuff, your name is right there in the thick of it. (you're usually alone, too.)

now with your editing of the "Numerus clausus", an article that has been relatively untouched in the last couple years, it's obvious that you're systematically hunting for any sort of facts that paint Poles in a positive light. What's even more ridiculously biased, and rather disgusting, I must say, is that you're removing facts pertaining to the suffering and plight the Poles experienced, even when their plight is directly tied and shared with the Polish Jews who found refuge and homes in Poland for 1000 years prior to WW2.

The Poles were the only friends the Jews ever had, your war on this fact won't erase that history.

Infoman182 (talk) 13:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The "suffering and plight" of Poles being the justification for physical assaults on Jewish students, enforced segregation, and a numerus clausus system on Jews ? Icewhiz (talk) 13:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--

you also removed any mention of Poles whom were subjected to numerus clausus during the partition periods. i'm quite certain that the extent of what you're trying to paint what happened in the 1930's is extremely blown out of proportion, as well. you're also conflating what I said about Poles and Jews shared plight with this numerus clasus subject, or anything that happened in the interwar period, instead of what I obviously meant with the entire shared history of Poles and Jews. Please stop playing dumb, I expect better from someone getting paid to do this. Infoman182 (talk) 13:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We generally remove unsourced information. Whom pray tell is paying me?Icewhiz (talk) 13:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mmhmm, sure thing dude. I'm absolutely sure you aren't a bad-faith actor and are applying your removal of unsourced content evenly and without bias, like in your edits of "Palestinian self-determination", or Iran, Turkey, Islamic terrorism, etc. Infoman182 (talk) 14:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wow! How interesting! You were actively trying to remove the article for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heaven_for_the_nobles%2C_Purgatory_for_the_townspeople%2C_Hell_for_the_peasants%2C_and_Paradise_for_the_Jews

I'm sensing a pattern.. Infoman182 (talk) 14:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I do try to stick to high quality academic sources for topics such as antisemitism in Poland, I guess that is a pattern. Icewhiz (talk) 14:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--

you're a disingenuous bigoted hack and a censor for the israeli government, that's the only `le-epic high-qualityz' pattern worth knowing about you, schmuck. Infoman182 (talk) 14:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AE

You've been reported at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Icewhiz (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are banned from all Poland-related topics for six months.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 08:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]