User talk:Infoflux

eBaum's World

Please do not blank out sections of pages for no apparent reason. --waffle iron 06:39, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dbchip 16:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I stated the reasoning for removal in the comment section. What is the proper way to have incorrect information removed from this site?

Semi-automated template substitution

This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Tawker 19:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rory0 96 19:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please tell me how to have incorrect information removed? Every time I remove it comes back? I guess I will have to keep trying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Infoflux (talk • contribs)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Sceptr e ^(Talk) 19:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its not vandelizism, im simply removing incorrect information. The article has a warning that it contains unneutral and unverified information. I am simply removing the parts that are objectionable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Infoflux (talk • contribs)

It is vandalism, and there's no way you can say that Ebaums isn't controversial. Nowhere in the article does it even say that the site did do anything wrong, it just describes the controversy. Deleting that is vandalism and making the article extremely biased. --Rory0 96 20:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is just another username that Mgunit is using. He's removing material that's "objectionable" to Eric and Neal Bauman's fragile ego. Mgunit spammed a few blogs with angry comments defending eBaum's World under the same name and he was caught. Just so everyone knows. Oh, and Web Junk 20 called: they want their show back. --Tokachu 21:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Checkuser shows that Infoflux and Mgunit are 98% likely to be the same person. You don't need more than one account here, Mgunit. DS 23:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]