User talk:Info-farmer
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, தகவலுழவன், and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Herald talk with me 16:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Mr.Magioladitis! sorry i am unable to continue my discussion with you. because, this is the bed time (beyond mid night in india). i hope we will continue. thanks indeed. 19:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Your new article
[edit]Hi, welcome to Wikipedia editing.
If you're interested in plants, please have a look at WP:PLANTS and its pages, in particular its article template.
Some points about Ormosia travancorica:
- Did you copy the information in the Description section from the source given? If so, it must be deleted immediately. You may not copy material: read WP:PLAGIARISM.
- The leading section of the article is supposed to summarize the content. Normally there should be little new information there. For a stub, it's often only possible to have a single section, but you should aim to follow this guideline. See WP:LEAD.
- You shouldn't write in "bullet" style as you did in the Description section. Wikipedia articles are written in prose: see WP:USEPROSE.
It's complicated to write a good Wikipedia article! Please don't be put off by these comments; at WP:PLANTS we're there to help. A good way to start is to look at some of the featured plant articles. Of course, it takes a long while to build up articles like this, but it can help show what to aim for. Most of the articles on Banksia species are worth looking at, for example. For a shorter article, look at Hyacinthoides non-scripta, perhaps.
Do feel free to ask questions at WT:PLANTS! Peter coxhead (talk) 09:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks indeed for you guidelines. Bye! --தகவலுழவன் (talk) 10:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
APG III
[edit]In your comment elsewhere you said "[I] think we should furnish updated classification as APG III not obsolete classification." We do follow APG III. I'm no expert on Fabaceae; what is currently wrong with the classification in the taxobox at Ormosia travancorica? Peter coxhead (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- I studied botany at college level. So, i know something about the plant classification. Naturally, I am interested in APG III and learning through internet. APG III( published in 2009 ) says,
- Cladus: Angiosperms
- Cladus: Eudicots(Not able to include even as unranked!)
- Cladus: Core eudicots
- Cladus: Rosids
- Cladus: Eurosids I
- but this taxobox says as "(unranked):" which should be as Cladus(life branch). I am coming to en.wikipedia to learn tech for my mother toungue Tamil. Please take necessary step. --தகவலுழவன் (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- "Cladus" is just the Latin for "clade", which is not a rank in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. So "unranked" is quite correct and is what we always use here. Eurosids I could have been included, but it was decided at WP:PLANTS to keep taxoboxes fairly simple to avoid them becoming too long and cluttered. If you think that this clade should always be included, start a discussion at WT :PLANTS and see if you can persuade people. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants is general, not specific for Angiosperms(250,000 to 400,000) species). I don't know, how many Angiosperm-plants are classified under the general system here. Please, note the experts around the world following APG III(Angiosperms#History_of_classification). Why should we? I am going to talk with my community not here. Because, my typing ability is high in my mother tongue only. The sections, i mentioned above are enough to start a discussion at WT :PLANTS. Please, discuss with your friends and make the history. --தகவலுழவன் (talk) 02:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand that it's not easy for you to discuss complicated issues in English.
- We do follow APG III. We just don't use every clade that has a name in APG III. (Just as we don't always put in subfamilies, subgenera, sections, etc.) The taxobox is meant to indicate where the taxon fits in the tree of life, not give all the detail of the classification. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants is general, not specific for Angiosperms(250,000 to 400,000) species). I don't know, how many Angiosperm-plants are classified under the general system here. Please, note the experts around the world following APG III(Angiosperms#History_of_classification). Why should we? I am going to talk with my community not here. Because, my typing ability is high in my mother tongue only. The sections, i mentioned above are enough to start a discussion at WT :PLANTS. Please, discuss with your friends and make the history. --தகவலுழவன் (talk) 02:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- "Cladus" is just the Latin for "clade", which is not a rank in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. So "unranked" is quite correct and is what we always use here. Eurosids I could have been included, but it was decided at WP:PLANTS to keep taxoboxes fairly simple to avoid them becoming too long and cluttered. If you think that this clade should always be included, start a discussion at WT :PLANTS and see if you can persuade people. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (Ormosia travancorica) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Ormosia travancorica, தகவலுழவன்!
Wikipedia editor Clockery just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've marked this article as reviewed. Try including a picture. Otherwise a good article. However, it didn't really need a definition of "canopy" as well, because you just need to link it to the page. :) Regards
To reply, leave a comment on Clockery's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Orphaned non-free image File:AWB-virtualbox-XP-error-why.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AWB-virtualbox-XP-error-why.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- //the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. // is wrong. See the usage of the image in Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser#SSL.2FTLS_error_in_XP. I am one of frequent uploader in Commons.but there is no room for this kind of image in Commons. so that i am using the image to get ride of my the AWB problem. --தகவலுழவன் (talk) 00:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Info-farmer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 01:48, Wednesday, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Info-farmer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Info-farmer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Info-farmer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Looking for help
[edit]Hi,
I was looking for some small help. I created a new article en:Kithaab-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages. Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab to your language. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.
Thanking you , with warm regards
Bookku (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Looking for help
[edit]Hi,
I was looking for some small help. I created a new article en:Kithaab-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages. Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab to your language. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.
Thanking you , with warm regards
Bookku (talk) 04:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
[SVG Translation Campaign 2019 India] Feedback survey
[edit]Greetings,
Many thanks for participating in the SVG Translation Campaign 2019 in India. It had been quite a successful campaign—194 users from 19 Indic languages took part in the campaign for 38 days, and have created more than 2,500 SVG files, all of them having labels in native Indian languages. You may read the complete report of the campaign at https://w.wiki/3yn.
We would like to thank you again for translating SVG files as a part of this campaign, your contributions have given thousands of people the knowledge that they need the most. Now we would like to have your feedback about the overall campaign, how effective were the training sessions, the resources provided, the support etc.
Please fill the feedback survey at https://forms.gle/4TCicfYzjAGVvKTy6
Your responses are extremely valuable to us, and will be of immense help to understand further training needs or plan future activities in this area. Let us know if you have any questions.
Please note that 4 August 2019 is the last date to complete the survey. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:08, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Toronto Tamil Film Festival has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Titodutta (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)