User talk:Inflammation

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Alcat Test has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — scetoaux (T|C) 20:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Alcat Test constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. — scetoaux (T|C) 20:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to The Alcat Test, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 16:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to The Alcat Test, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 20:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you nominate this article for speedy again it will be considered vandalism. Verbal chat 21:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you to determine what content is posted to this page? There is clear evidence both way and it is obvious that there is a strong disagreement between two sides. The ALCAT Test has been around for 23 years, with thousands of doctors using the test and tens of thousands of patients having success. You have no right to play "god". The best thing to do is to delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inflammation (talk • contribs) 21:14, 10 March 2009

March 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Antigen leukocyte cellular antibody test. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in User talk:Inflammation, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page deletion

You can't decide that a page should be deleted because you don't like the content - even if you created it. Wikipedia has many articles where people disagree on content and people work together to find a compromise to uphold WP:NPOV or in some cases, present multiple sides to an issue. When we can't agree, sometimes we have to go to dispute resolution. However repeatedly nominating an article for deletion is considered disruptive and you will be blocked from editing if this continues. Edit warring is also considered disruptive and will also get you blocked. You can find more help at WP:Help. Good luck. Toddst1 (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I would like to find a compromise to this situation. The ALCAT Test has benefitted thousands of people. It is not a scam. I understand that there is conflicting opinions on the efficacy of the test. Despite all the studies saying there are no benefits of the test, there is a reason that this test has been around for over 23 years. There are dozens of clinical studies and countless testimonials stating saying this test is useful in finding a solution when traditional medicine can't solve a problem. You would be amazed at how many problems are related to our diets. Inflammation (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Inflammation[reply]

Zero peer-reviewed clinical trials, unless you want to count the few that found nothing that indicates this test is worth anything. Testimonials fail WP:MEDRS. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 20:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ALCAT test for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ALCAT test is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALCAT test until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Plot Spoiler (talk) 23:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]