User talk:InfinityTrainer

November 2020

Stop reverting at Revan until you have determined consensus for your changes by discussing the situation at the article talks page. Tiderolls 15:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Grand Admiral Thrawn, you may be blocked from editing. Please don't add hoax citation. According to the new book, Thrawn is a merit adoptive of Mitth family. Which also means other Mitth family member are not "brother/father". Please dig out the name of the book that references your content in Star Wars Expanded Universe (legend ) instead. Special:Diff/992663465 Matthew hk (talk) 06:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew hk: And those were his merit adoptive father and brother within the Mitth family, as in the book I am referencing, Thrawn Ascendancy: Chaos Rising. Do you need the specific page? InfinityTrainer (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The book did not said they are simply father or brother. Yes, specific page and not bluffing. Matthew hk (talk) 06:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, from Outbound Flight, "Car'das and Ferasi: this is Syndic Mitth'ras'safis of the Eighth Ruling Family. My brother." InfinityTrainer (talk) 09:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outbound Flight is legends. Please state the page number from the alleged Chaos Rising. Matthew hk (talk) 12:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok to add Outbound Flight as citation BTW, but it need to be marked as Legends as well as ideally, full citation (See Template:Cite book for full parameter). Matthew hk (talk) 15:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi, please remember to cite sources when adding new content to articles. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, it's very easy or even automatic to add citations if you're citing a webpage, you just need the URL. Thank you :) – Thjarkur (talk) 21:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coming to America (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leslie Jones. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mystery Babylon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mystery Babylon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A question about your earlier editing

Before you created this account was all your editing done as anonymous IP editing, or did you have an earlier account? JBW (talk) 20:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evading blocks on IP addresses you have used. Furthermore, you have continued the kinds of disruptive editing that led to the IP blocks, including continuing edit-wars that you had started as an IP editor, on more than one article.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: While I would call your rollbacks harmful to Wikipedia, I nonetheless wish you a very Merry Christmas! And a Happy New Year! InfinityTrainer (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, but it isn't harmful to Wikipedia, because reverting all editing by persistently disruptive editors evading blocks is the one thing which stands some chance of discouraging them from further block-evasion. Of course it isn't 100% effective, but it is often enough effective enough to make it on balance beneficial to Wikipedia, even having taken into consideration the possibility of losing some useful editing amongst the crap. JBW (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JBW, I just blocked a few more socks. You can consider changing the block on the range if it continues. Drmies (talk) 15:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]