User talk:Infinity4just

Welcome

Hello, Infinity4just, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content must be presented in appropriate weight

Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, P. K. Abdul Aziz, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please take your concerns to the article talk page and gain consensus. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. your accusation of editing a biography of living person without a reliable source is utterly false. I will like to challenge you on this point. Kindly do show me a single piece of information put in by me in the biography which is not reliably sourced.Infinity4just (talk) 18:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not only a question of reliable sources, but of whether the content is being presented in a manner which gives it undue weight etc.

Please do not edit war as it will lead to you being blocked. (note: The removal of inappropriate content about a living person is not subject the the 3 revert minimum. ) You will need to make a case for the detailed coverage and the appropriateness of sourcing on the article talk page. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:11, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]