User talk:InedaBonghit666

May 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Roger Waters, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InedaBonghit666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do anything wrong. Everything I added to Roger Waters' page was true. InedaBonghit666 (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Perhaps you would be happier trolling someplace else. Yamla (talk) 15:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not change unblock requests after they have been closed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 01:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InedaBonghit666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sincerely sorry for my behavior in the past and promise to only contribute positively in the future if unblocked. Can I please be unblocked?

Decline reason:

If you have no specific contributions you want to make at this time, there is no need to unblock you. Part of being assured that you won't continue the same behavior that got you blocked is knowing what contributions you want to make. You don't get many points for not violating policy regarding creating sock puppets to evade your block, as that should not be done anyway. When you know of a constructive contribution you want to make, you may make a new unblock request; I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What constructive contributions do you want to make? What was wrong with the contributions you made that got you blocked, and why should any administrator believe you won't make them again? 331dot (talk) 10:17, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that I have any contributions to make right now, I just said that I would only make constructive contributions in the future. I have better things to do with my life than vandalize someone's wikipedia page for fun, that's why you should believe me. I haven't tried to get around the block by creating alternate accounts, that's why you should believe me.