User talk:Indusdreams

I fail to see how this frankly rather amareurish design does anything. I could create an image of Hubal myself, one that is far more likely to resemble the original that than this ridiculous horned and cloaked super-villain figure that looks as though it comes from a teenager's fantasy derived from reading modern comic books. There is nothing encyclopedic about this image that I can make out. Paul B (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised the issue at Wikipedia talk:Image use policy. Paul B (talk) 16:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I understand that some of the comments about your artwork were hurtful, but you can't respond in the way you have been. EEng (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I admit I went a too far in describing the picture, and for that I do apologize. I do not even expect an apology in return for the continual failure to assume good faith, the unevidenced accusations of bias, or trying to teach "good manners" by claiming that I was raped by a priest and insinuating that I'm suicidal.

I hope you have a better experience on the site, and advise that things go better when you:

assume that other people are here to help the site, even if they do not help you
do not make any claim without evidence, be they explicit examples of editor behavior or academic sources
do not have any strong feelings (especially of ownership) towards anything you add here, and be ready for anyone to remove it

Ian.thomson (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]