User talk:Indrooooz

Welcome!

Hi Indrooooz! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Barelvi, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Barelvi. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. That there is a systematic bias is your opinio, but source you cited does not actually say it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barelvi; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RegentsPark (comment) 19:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

en-wikiquote

Hi, Indrooooz. Some pov-pusher keeps on making tendentious pages at en-wikiquote just to push an anti-Muslim POV. I noticed you have been active there, perhaps you could take a look at these articles: [1] [2] [3] --Sheardevi (talk) 14:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]