User talk:IndonesianEconomy

uploaded image

Indonesian tractors image uploaded. talk page updated.

License tagging for File:Agricultural Tractors Indonesia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Agricultural Tractors Indonesia.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks i have added the tag to the image. IndonesianEconomy (talk) 06:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an extensive list of tractors in Indonesia along with Indonesian suppliers on right. The image is taken from an article and the license policy was added to the image.

http://www.alibaba.com/countrysearch/ID/tractor.html

also after seeing discussion page for Indonesia economy I wanted to note that Indonesia helped India with tractors

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-02-11/india-business/28543335_1_manufacturing-plant-apollo-tyres-tractors

IndonesianEconomy (talk) 11:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tractor image

Do not re-add that image again:

It is a low res poor quality image
You do not have permission to use it. It is not free use.
This is a feature article and the accepted version.
Most agriculture in Indonesia is done by hand - are you ashamed? Stop whitewashing.

I suggest you seek to have it deleted from wikipedia. If you don't, I will. If you continue with this pic, I will seek administrator advice. --Merbabu (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the other user has said you are making biased edits in indonesia articles. Your use of language such as "are you ashamed? stop whitewashing" shows your biased nature. India has extensive and widepsread use of bullock carts but you have not put any such picture on the Indian front page. I feel that its better if you change your attitude or like other muslim users on wikipedia have suggested it would be better for us to make our own website as this is just going down the drain with hindu edits all over indonesia and other muslim countries articles. IndonesianEconomy (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dont waste time over here there is no point

If you want to waste time on this website that is your problem but all of us are leaving, nobody is going to come back again and again to remove the vandalism from the article. The website is just biased nonsense, you might as well watch fox news because this website is the same as fox news.

Majority of muslims have already moved over to muslim wiki

http://muslimwiki.com/mw/index.php/MuslimWiki

A more concrete website is also being planned so no more vandalism and no more coming back day after day to remove the vandalism created by others in muslim articles. We have more important things to do than come in everyday to remove vandalism. IndonesianEconomy (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Agricultural Tractors Indonesia.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Agricultural Tractors Indonesia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

User merbabu biased editing

User merbabu is making biased edits in Indonesia articles. Just because india is a poverty stricken country that will never develop and will never matter in the world, does not mean that out of jealousy you write rubbish in other countries articles. India has extensive and widepsread use of bullock carts but you have not put any such picture on the Indian front page.

Also note that Indonesia is helping india with tractors http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-02-11/india-business/28543335_1_manufacturing-plant-apollo-tyres-tractors Also note the page on agriculture in India which shows that more than 52% of the country employed in agricultre, lack of modern equipment and irrigation facilities in indian agriculture and constant problems due to dependence on monsoons.

Please add the following picture to the indian main page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Farmer_in_Tamil_Nadu_1993.JPG or for transport http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:India.Mumbai.04.jpg

Indonesia is much more modern than a country like india and will continue to modernize unlike india, irrelevant of what you put on a website like wikipedia. I would advise you to change your attitude or like other muslim users on wikipedia have suggested it would be better for us to make our own website for muslim countries as this is just going down the drain with annoying jealous hindu edits in muslim countries articles. IndonesianEconomy (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that nobody else in the world would allow hindus to come to their lands or give them stuff. Only muslim countries in the past gave them stuff and allowed them to come for work. Now that muslims have backed away and told hindus that they dont want anything to do with them it gives them a shock that now they have nobody in the world. They have an attitude that says that "if you muslims back away then who will help us? we dont have anyone else". So it seems to be an issue that they keep targeting muslim countries articles or keep running after muslim countries because they know nobody else will give them anything. Now that muslims have backed away the hindus seem to have gone mad that there is no one else for them. I guess they understand that nobody else in the world would allow hindus to come to their land or give them stuff. 114.74.197.78 (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an inappropriate use of the article's talk page. The purpose of a talk page is to discuss how best to improve the article, not to hurl accusations at other editors, draw comparisons between different articles or different countries, or make broad accusations of bias that do not pertain to the issues at hand. If you have an issue with a particular editor, take it to his or her own talk page, and please assume good faith. Also, please note that this is a featured article that has been worked on by numerous editors and extensively peer-reviewed, so the changes that are made need to reflect a consensus of editors and need to follow Wikipedia guidelines, which your edits have not. I have yet to hear a reason supporting the changes you are trying to make, and the issues you have raised have nothing to do with the objections that have been stated. Finally, it is the responsibility of no editor but yourself to make the changes that you want to see on Wikipedia. No editor is responsible for the content of any page. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. Feeeshboy (talk) 18:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article about Indonesia is not a collaborative effort. This article about Indonesia is owned by user Merbabu. Other users cannot change or fix it. Period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.165.14.239 (talk) 00:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did someone reply? I could not be bothered with this website since its just biased nonsense and give me a break with the "peer reviewed" nonsense. Its not peer reviewed its just reviewed by biased people. You might as well watch fox news because this website is the same as fox news.

Majority of muslims have already moved over to muslim wiki and other websites

http://muslimwiki.com/mw/index.php/MuslimWiki

A more concrete website is also being planned so no more vandalism and no more coming back day after day to remove the vandalism created by others in muslim articles. We have more important things to do than come in everyday to clear away vandalism. IndonesianEconomy (talk) 00:42, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok, all the best to you then. Goodbye. --Merbabu (talk) 00:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe Merbabu still have problem with Indonesian writers since 3 years ago. Merbabu, we appreciate your contribution for Indonesia, but seriously you have to learn how to deal with your Indonesian peers, especially those who are being critical with your writing. Appreciation should come both ways, my friend. You don't own this page. So many times you behave like one. If you don't change your attitude you will be in trouble all the time here. I mean look at that, 3 years already and you still have problem with Indonesians. People who make progress is the one who is being humble and learn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryTrv (talk • contribs) 14:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that user Merbabu knows NOTHING about Indonesia yet fortunately (or unfortunately?) he writes and creates an article about Indonesia. The provinces... Even he didn't know about the difference between Papua and West Papua, and I needed to fix it years ago. Anyway, I'm bored with this article. Lack of interesting and educative words. It's BIASED, written by people who knows nothing about Indonesia (and how the heaven do they know Indonesian economy?), and even written by NON-INDONESIANS that never travel from Aceh to Papua (just stuck in Java and Bali may be, LOL), never learn about Indonesian native cultures (different each ethnic group), and never have any intention to fix their mistakes. Other articles about Indonesia in Wikipedia in other languages are far BETTER (except for those that just copy this English version). If I knew this earlier, in 2003 I'd write a better article about Indonesia before someone made it (and then he thinks he owns it). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.165.14.239 (talk) 00:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]