User talk:Indivision

Spam in BattleGlobe

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on BattleGlobe, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because BattleGlobe is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting BattleGlobe, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. There's definitely a misunderstanding here which may affect the way you go forward, so I'll try to explain. Two people assessed your article; the editor who tagged it, and the administrator who deleted it (me). The editor who tagged it selected the tag referencing advertising, and noted in the edit summary that there were only 94 Google hits associated with the topic (BattleGlobe). However, when I read and assessed the article, I deleted it (and provided an edit summary indicating this) because it did not meet our "notability" guidelines. Frankly, I agree with you that the article did not seem to be particularly bad in an advertising sense, and I'm not sure why the tagging editor chose that tag. However, the article had definite problems with our notability policy and also contained no reliable sources. Here's the set of problems you need to address. You have to somehow demonstrate that BattleGlobe is more notable -- better, more special, more useful, more fun -- than other games of its type. And the way you need to demonstrate that is by finding reliable sources that say so -- reputable arm's-length third-party experts not associated with the game company. This generally does NOT mean posts in forums, but worthwhile material online for an online game might be acceptable -- I think that judgment would be made on a case-by-case basis. You can read the notability and reliable sources policies by following the links I've provided above. As you requested, I've provided you with the deleted material in a sandbox page at User:Indivision/Sandbox. Some further assistance might be found at Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? and WP:Your first article. If you have any further questions, I'll try to assist you if you leave me a note. (I'm not an expert on online sources but I might be able to find you one.) Accounting4Taste:talk 14:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Byron Hout

The article Byron Hout has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

wp:oneevent. Non-notable college football player/graduate assistant otherwise. coverage is about event not subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CutOffTies (talk) 13:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]