User talk:Indiasummer95
|
An invitation to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hello! Indiasummer95,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 02:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
|
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
[edit]World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Indiasummer95! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
October 2013
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 05:41, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Template:EDL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Richard BB 10:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Indiasummer95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I admit that I am fiery. But I came across so much POV on Wikipedia that trying to reverse it I put in my own. If you search my edit history,removing bias has been a raison d'etre. I think that to aid the stress of everybody I will avoid contentious political issues and simply edit on things like sports and games, if I pass this unblock, which I barely expect. Some of my edit summaries highlighted were either the same kind of personal attacks which I have suffered, or me simply having a differing opinion to the core members of Wikipedia. The fact that few Muslims see the Bible as foretelling Muhammad, or back it with the fabricated Gospel of Barnabas looked like pseudoarchaeology in a nutshell. Also with the grooming rings - they have much content saying that there were debates on the role of Islamic culture in them. And I was threatend with ANI for categorising them Islam-related controversies. I only added them because I saw in that category, a Brazilian school shooting in which the perp was rumoured to be fixated by Islam was labelled as such. What was the difference? Did I say Islam caused it or that there was a controversy. Some users have said that as my user page has Conservative views, I am not to be trusted. I have seen others write communist prose on their pages. Not naming names. I thought Wikipedia was a free and equal bastion of knowledge. But you seem to not even notice the leftist and Islamic POV (I have deleted such claims as that Muslims discovered America or that they were the indigenous people of Sicily until nasty Crusaders took it over). Some quality control, eh? But I am the villain in all of that? I'm the POV pusher, deluded ethnocentric fantasist? Also, User:Pass a Method reversed my edits on Islam Awareness Week. It is now full of unsourced POV and even exclamation marks and irrelevant copy/pasted material. But I'm the one harming this site's integrity?
Decline reason:
Per below and user's subsequent socking. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Um ...have you read WP:GAB? The above is surely not at all compliant with the requirements for unblock ES&L 22:42, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Indiasummer95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
When I was abusing Wikipedia I was getting into mental health medication. It is a testimony that my subsequent account had over 1,500 edits and not a single revert. I will accept any topic ban given and a 100% deal to not use talk and user talk pages Indiasummer95 (talk) 16:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given the abuse of multiple socks to evade this block, and your self-disclosed mental health issues I'm giving you the standard offer. Follow the instructions there and we'll revisit this issue in 6 months time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 18:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Which subsequent account are you referring to? Kuru (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
This one. --AL (talk) 19:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Indiasummer95, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Indiasummer95. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rschen7754 20:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:Lincoln F.C. badge.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Lincoln F.C. badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
File source problem with File:College Europa FC.png
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:College Europa FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FBC Calangianus 1905 logo.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:FBC Calangianus 1905 logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tell Mama UK logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Tell Mama UK logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Caballas Coalition logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Caballas Coalition logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Midlands News Association logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Midlands News Association logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Al Madinah School Derby logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Al Madinah School Derby logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)