User talk:Indianite

Greetings! You can start a conversation here by posting your message below.

January 2021

Hello, I'm Pahunkat. I noticed that in this edit to Akhtarul Iman, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pahunkat (talk) 20:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Pahunkat, the edit was a manual revert. If you check the page, content had been added in an improper manner. Hence I was correcting the article. --Indianite (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for letting me know - you're welcome to remove the content, but in future please use an edit summary to explain why you are doing so. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 20:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Indianite! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can't find Draft in pending AfC submissions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Jamia Millia Islamia people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DS/Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vikram Vincent 17:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Your recent editing history at Safoora Zargar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vikram Vincent 17:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that I should have raised the issue on a talk page before making the edit. I appreciate the warning (just that it appears somewhat threatening in appearance considering that I wasn't repeatedly overriding other edits).--Indianite (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LOL yeah I can empathise :-) Vikram Vincent 20:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shama (Magazine) has been accepted

Shama (Magazine), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 17:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danish Siddiqui has been accepted

Danish Siddiqui, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 00:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ambarish Rai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CPI(ML).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Submission of article

Hello, I want to submit an article to Wikipedia about Dr. Manish Goutam from Ranchi Jharkhand. Mgroy (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mgroy. You can check this page for help regarding creating your first Wikipedia article. You can check this space if you have any questions. Feel free to discuss any issue you encounter with me, here itself. Have a good day! --Indianite (talk) 02:09, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hi, I think you are from India and you are well versed with Indian politics or/and aware of atleast since you participated in that articles. However, moving on to the matter. Some private and one-sided newspapers and their line is not credible at all. Just look at the use of the word "GODI" in headlines and most are from Alt News which is quite famous for its misinformation. These lines need to be removed to prevent people from giving false information and to prevent using or maligning the life image of the person on whom this article is based.Just another Wikipedian editor (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Stop making this edit. It is disruptive. 27.57.181.26 (talk) 04:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andaman and Nicobar Islands

Regarding this edit, where is the source? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 10:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Midday Meal Scheme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puducherry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kadapa district, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kondapuram, Rajupalem and Kamalapuram.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of converts to Islam from Hinduism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Capitals00 (talk) 19:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BLPCAT. None of the sources you added cite statement from A. R. Rahman himself if he converted from Hinduism to Islam. Also see WP:HISTRS to understand why a source from 1914 cannot be used. Capitals00 (talk) 19:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Capitals00, let's take this up on the talk page of the list. Indianite (talk) 10:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohibbullah Nadvi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Indianite. Thank you for your work on Vallur mandal. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]