User talk:IndianWikipedians

Welcome

Hello, IndianWikipedians, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

IndianWikipedians, good luck, and have fun. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

create page

Amadand IndianWikipedians (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

blocking

September 2017

Hello, I'm L3X1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Amadand without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ram Pothineni has been reverted.
Your edit here to Ram Pothineni was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/Ramsayz) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So the image of it was said that you removed IndianWikipedians (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sachin Atulkar IndianWikipedians (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

page

Category:WikiProject Requested articles IndianWikipedians (talk) 11:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Nm52664 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 15:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndianWikipedians (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

bhai mai kya karu mujhe wo username pasand nahi tha aur maine kya galti kiya hai jo tumne mujhe block kiya aur iske alawa maine koi galti kiya ho to mujhe btaya jaye galti ye kar diya tumse madad mang li to bhai maine isliye madad mangi ki tumhe experience hai wo mera hi username hai nm52664 but wo account mai nahi open karta issliye mera nm52664 wala account band karke mere is IndianWikipedians account ko unblock kardo IndianWikipedians (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; this is the English wikipedia, unblock requests must be made in English. Yamla (talk) 16:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndianWikipedians (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Brother, what made me mistake that you blocked me, I did not like nm52664 this username, so I created a RaashikhannaDHFR account and without blocking the account you did not even tell me what else I made a mistake if I made any other mistake. I made a mistake that I demanded help from the IndianWikipedians, so I will be blocked by making any excuse if this is the case, from today I I will stop running the Wikipedia. If you have blocked any other mistake, I will tell you if I have made any other mistake, otherwise my account should be unblocked

Decline reason:

See below. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IndianWikipedians (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

request for unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndianWikipedians (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

dear SpacemanSpiff And Elcobbola, what made me mistake that you blocked me, I did not like nm52664 this username, so I created a RaashikhannaDHFR account and without blocking the account you did not even tell me what else I made a mistake if I made any other mistake. I made a mistake that I demanded help from the IndianWikipedians, so I will be blocked by making any excuse if this is the case, from today I I will stop running the Wikipedia. If you have blocked any other mistake, I will tell you if I have made any other mistake, otherwise my account should be unblocked

Decline reason:

Disruptive editing, and also an unambiguous sockpuppet of an editor who has been blocked in numerous accounts, at least as far back as July 2017. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IndianWikipedians (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Typically I would not respond, as I blocked your socks on the Commons and Commons matters are to be handled there, not on sister sites. However, as it may aid consideration of the unblock request here: per the Commons CU, you are

Confirmed to be disruptively using multiple accounts, which you seem to acknowledge ("I did not like nm52664 this username, so I created a RaashikhannaDHFR account"); a summary timeline:

18 July 2017 - Virajmishra master notified that its multiple copyvio uploads were nominated for deletion;
23 July 2017 - Virajmishra edits/vandalises the DR (perhaps laughingly - "Baha"), confirming you are aware of the issue;
26 July 2017 - Nm52664 sock uploads copyvios of the same sort and subject matter as the Virajmishra uploads;
27 July 2017 - Nm52664 sock notified, warned and then ultimately blocked for uploading unfree files after warnings. Also on this day: Nm52664 makes two UDR requests ([1][2]) indicating 1) awareness of adverse actions against the files and 2) ongoing cluelessness about our free (libre) requirements; another user leaves a message for Nm52664 sock attempting to explain our requirements and offering to help;
02 September 2017 - RaashikhannaDHFR sock uploads copvios of the same sort and subject matter as the Virajmishra/Nm52664 uploads, which are deleted, and you notified of the same;
12 - 14 September 2017 - The IndianWikipedians sock uploads copyvios of the same sort and subject matter as the Virajmishra/Nm52664/RaashikhannaDHFR uploads.

In short, it is not a mistake that you were blocked ("what made me mistake that you blocked me") and the purport that you were not informed of the issue ("you did not even tell me what else I made a mistake if I made any other mistake") is entirely disingenuous. You ignored multiple warnings, responses to UDR requests and explicit offers to help and instead created multiple accounts to continue uploading disruptive files. I've not reviewed your edits to en.wiki, but there are real WP:CIR, WP:IDHT and WP:NOTHERE issues, and that doesn't change just because the commons.wikimedia prefix shifts to en.wikipedia. Эlcobbola _talk 21:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Globally locked

This account, the sockmaster and a few other sockpuppets are currently globally locked. —SpacemanSpiff 14:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]