User talk:IndiaIsTheBest

Warning

It's obvious that you are here to promote an agenda and not here to build an encyclopaedia. If this continues any further then your editing privileges will be revoked. You are continuing the same behavior from your IP editing earlier, so this isn't anything new. —SpacemanSpiff 15:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What did i do now????

To answer your question on my talk page, everything you've done here has been disruptive and show that you are here to just promote your agenda and are in the process wasting the time of volunteer editors. —SpacemanSpiff 15:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 11:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndiaIsTheBest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked to edit a template when i even had provided the reliable source! If the source is been provided... Then why am i being threatened and blocked Please unblock me?

Decline reason:

Hello. You have not addressed the issues that lead to your block- disruptive editing and operating toward an outside agenda. These are serious matters and go deeper than a template. Perhaps it was the purpose to which the template was to be applied? You must address the behavior that lead to your block. Thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

IndiaIsTheBest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19893 was submitted on Nov 29, 2017 12:12:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IndiaIsTheBest (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC) Sir help. I have been threatened and Blocked!!!!

IndiaIsTheBest (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC) Sir it was you, who told me for the first time that templates don't need source. I get it. But someone has blocked me from Wikipedia for that metter of template. I know my mistake and i agree on that. Please help me and unblock me sir.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndiaIsTheBest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a new editor. Yes, i accept i was not listening to the warnings because i never knew there is something like that. I understand it was a fault from my site. And i promise to improve my Wikipedia works and job from my part. I apologize for reverting the edits because i provided source for my uploads and i thought that information is always 100% correct if you connect it with a reliable source. I was wrong. I didn't knew there are false sources on Google Books that I've to verify before adding it to any wikipedia article. Please accept my apologies and i also promise that i would never do such things again like reverting edits without discussing on talk page. Please accept my apology for my mistakes and unblock me cuz these activities will never ever happe again from my behalf. IndiaIsTheBest (talk) 13:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response in a week. SQL ^{Query me!} 04:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How will you contribute to the encyclopedia if you were to be unblocked? Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 06:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]