User talk:Indepentten

License tagging for File:Roomertravel.com logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Roomertravel.com logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roomer (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roomer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Indepentten, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Roomertravel service2.png

Thanks for uploading File:Roomertravel service2.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Roomertravel service.png

Thanks for uploading File:Roomertravel service.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roomer (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roomer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Indepentten, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roomer has been accepted

Roomer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Roomertravel.com logo1.png

Thanks for uploading File:Roomertravel.com logo1.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paid to edit?

Are you receiving payment for editing Wikipedia? If so please be aware of WP:COI and that under the site's terms of use you need to declare the details of your contract on your user page. Alexbrn (talk) 02:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Indepentten. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Face lift dentistry,. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Indepentten. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Indepentten|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. LeadSongDog come howl! 03:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Hello Alexbrn, I think I did answer your question yesterday. I am not receiving any compensation neither having any relation of employment to this article or the inventor. I am interested in helping this article to improve it, because I think this new tech will help many others to live their better lives. Please let me know if I can continue editing or what else to do to improve it, and good editing skill does not means payment or relation. I also need your help, because the title looks informal when it is not capitalized, and when I used DISPLAYTITLE, it did not seem working. Indepentten (talk) 14:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying your position. As to editing, I recommend starting at WP:5P. I'm not sure the topic of Face lift dentistry is however worthy of an article - please continue any discussion on the article's Talk page or at WT:MED, where I have mentioned the article. Alexbrn (talk) 15:18, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexbrn and other editors, Thank you for your suggestions. I believe I did follow the Five Pillars when I edited it, for example: Pillar #2: Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view: We strive for articles that document and explain the major points of view, giving due weight with respect to their prominence in an impartial tone. We avoid advocacy and we characterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas there may be just one well-recognized point of view; in others, we describe multiple points of view, presenting each accurately and in context rather than as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial... ————————— To follow this Pillar, I searched the Internet to gather information to show in the Media Review section that this topic and its views are very popular. In addition, all information provided is cited with reliable source. And thus it is worth to be an independent wiki article.

Pillar #4: Editors should treat each other with respect and civility: Respect your fellow Wikipedians, even when you disagree. Apply Wikipedia etiquette, and don't engage in personal attacks. Seek consensus, avoid edit wars, and never disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Act in good faith, and assume good faith on the part of others... ————————— To follow this Pillar, I respected other editors to keep all contents with reliable sources, and deleted those from non reliable sources. So please respect my work, and do not delete those contents with highly reliable sources. My opinion is, when a topic is so popular and attracting huge amount of discussions and media reports, it is worth being a wiki article.

In addition, I fully understood your argument and doubt. Since Face Lift Dentistry is such a brand new technology, your doubt can be easily understood; for example, when the first computer was invented, people should have had enough reasons to doubt about the fact that if it was qualified to be listed as an wiki article. Thank you for the consideration. Indepentten (talk) 12:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict

There is currently a conflict of this article, and a request of dispute has been sent to the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request to conduct an open discussion.

Editors Alexbrn and KateWishing were invited to this discussion.

Thank you for your help. Indepentten (talk) 23:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]