User talk:InTheBigHouse

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InTheBigHouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocked, but uncertain as to why, no information received

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InTheBigHouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account has been blocked for no reason - I have received no information about this, - it has just been blocked. I have not caused any damage or disruption, so again I am not sure why you have mentioned such a thing. My contributions were constructive and useful. Please review them and please unblock my account.

Decline reason:

We're not here to read the guide for appealing blocks for/to/with you. MER-C 17:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is simply not true. Your block log is available here and when you try to edit, the reason for your block is clearly displayed. Please stop trying to mislead us. --Yamla (talk) 12:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are talking about. All it says is multiple accounts. What multiple accounts? This is my account, it is just one account. I don't have another. Why would you say this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by InTheBigHouse (talk • contribs)

If you are unable to read then you lack sufficient competence to edit here. --Yamla (talk) 12:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am able to read. Why would you say that I can't? — Preceding unsigned comment added by InTheBigHouse (talk • contribs)

You falsely claimed you'd been blocked for no reason. When I pointed out to you that there was indeed a reason given, you then stated "all it says is multiple accounts" and asked "what multiple accounts". Given that that information was already clearly stated in your block reason (you are Dopenguins, a banned user), you were either trying to mislead us or lacked sufficient competence to read your block notice. Either way, it doesn't bode well for your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 12:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I have no idea why you are saying that I am someone else. Why would you say that? My account username is InTheBigHouse. I don't have another account. Why do you claim that? I think there has been some sort of mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InTheBigHouse (talk • contribs)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InTheBigHouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the guide to appealing blocks and none of the situations apply as this is the only account I have. I am not the owner of any other account and have done nothing wrong. The edits I made were useful, constructive contributions and were not disruptive as has been said.

Decline reason:

I don't find your explanation credible. I am declining your request and as I don't believe further requests here will be productive, I am removing talk page access. 331dot (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

InTheBigHouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24838 was submitted on Apr 22, 2019 19:11:10. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

InTheBigHouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24845 was submitted on Apr 23, 2019 05:37:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]