User talk:Impartial Unbiased

Leave messages here, I will reply on your talk pages.

September 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion from multiple prior socks. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:45, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For example, Neutral Player (talk · contribs) is very WP:DUCKy. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Impartial Unbiased (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Some kind of mistake. I am new here, I am sorry fi my edits looked like other people's. If you tell me where I went wrong and what I did that wasn't right, I promise not to do it again. Impartial Unbiased (talk) 22:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're obviously Neutral Player. Also per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sinbad_Barron/Archive#23_September_2010.Chaser (talk) 23:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is master puppeteer, Sinbad Barron (talk · contribs). User:MuZemike should be contacted before any kind of unblocking attempts. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 22:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]