User talk:Imitational voice of a Jesus

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shelling of Yeonpyeong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 01:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Grsz 11 02:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for trolling. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 02:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imitational voice of a Jesus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How am I trolling? I asked TWO people to explain why my edits were wrong in their view. Is that too much to ask? I am following the word of Jehovah God because the Bible shows how the the creator is against war and similar activity.

Decline reason:

Your actions are inappropriate because adding your religious opinions to Wikipedia is a violation of the neutral point of view guidelines. Your unblock request does not indicate that you understand what kinds of information are useful in an encyclopedia, so an unblock would not be appropriate. Please, only make a second unblock request if you can clearly explain why your edits were inappropriate and what your plan is for editing differently in the future. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imitational voice of a Jesus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept to not add the words back and I shall do my best to follow Wikipedia policies in the future. Please unblock me as God tells us to be forgiving to fellow man for his mistakes.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sock of banned user. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia has no religion, so God doesn't tell us anything. Grsz 11 02:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can accept that and can adhere to Wikipedia policies in future.

If one of my students took a test, and instead of writing the answers, merely wrote 'I know the answers to this test,' that student would get an 'F.' What, specifically, will you do differently? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will instead follow Wikipedia policies by refraining from violating wP:NPOV. I will specifically edit articles and add content to them using sources such as those from notable websites such as bbc.co.uk and will refrain from adding religious messages in the text.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imitational voice of a Jesus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting unblock with same reasoning as previous request with supporting discussion + I challenge the idea that I am a sock of a banned user.

Decline reason:

Whether you're a sock or not (and I have no reason to doubt jpgordon), your account has been used for nothing but trolling and wasting our time with frivolous unblock requests. I have revoked your talk page access.Chaser (talk) 05:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I might suggest changing your username in addition if an administrator accepts. mechamind 9 0 05:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]