User talk:Imgayrofl

Welcome!

Hello, Imgayrofl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Yeah we pumpin (talk) 06:52, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imgayrofl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I should be unbanned, because the basis for this ban is entirely false. I am not here just to vandalize as proven here. I believe that I was banned unfairly and solely because I used the GNAA logo on my userpage, wikipedia is denying my basic human right to free speech and belief. And I therefore should be unbanned Imgayrofl (talk) 05:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not whatsoever - so many things show you're not here to contribute to an encyclopedia of knowledge (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Free speech is not a right on Wikipedia. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but my argument of not being only for vandalism still stands. And wikipedia should be for free speech. I would also like to say I am not a sockpuppet of User:Yeah we pumpin. Imgayrofl (talk) 06:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this account is a Confirmed sock of User:Red Rover112, who I've indeffed for using good hand/bad hand accounts to troll. WilliamH (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've got to say

This it totally bogus. You know what? Just like me, this user is actually gay. I know typically it may be used as an excuse by vandals, but you know what? Some of us are gay and those of that are take extreme offense to using it in a ban reason. I've had friends with several thousands edits who have walked away from Wikipedia editing just for this block of a comrade alone. You know what? If that's all of your take on homosexuality and fun-loving free spirits like my friend here, and yes he is my personal friend, say what you will, I don't want to edit here, either. I know -for a fact- that this user is not only an editor of other wikis, but staff on said wikis, and I have NEVER seen him vandalise even a single wiki. I hope you all enjoy your anti-gay bigotry. I for one will never be using your website again. 64.123.99.139 (talk) 06:19, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Call me stupid but I fail to see the reason he was banned. This is a fifteen-year-old child that was banned indefinitely for what? Being immature? He's had nothing but positive edits to the mainspace, and is a bloody wiki-whizz. Tell me what he did wrong so that I may emulate it to be a better person. He wasn't even warned. He was also falsely accused of sockpuppetry. Are there no rules at all here on moderation? Did he do something to have his own page rights revoked? Go ahead and ban me, too, he's the only reason I even started editing, and you have my word that I have never seen him vandalise a single article on any wiki in my life, although I have seen him do thousands of unarguably and very positive edits. Mike of Ilvadel (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sock.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 21:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An IP editor makes an account and it's a "sock"? Aren't IP's encouraged to register? -badmachine 22:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a self-identified friend of a gay person, they should not be editing Wikipedia in the first place. GreenReaper (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

what

the hell happened here --Genya Avocado (talk) 20:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]