User talk:Imeoneta03

Hello, Imeoneta03, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 02:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Hello! Imeoneta03, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 23:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:19, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Epifanio de los Santos Avenue

The article Epifanio de los Santos Avenue you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Epifanio de los Santos Avenue for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 09:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While you're within your rights to nominate the article at WP:GAR, in this case I don't think it's a good idea. The original review wasn't in bad faith, nor was it lacking detail or suggestions needed to bring the article up to GA standards. In those cases, it's usually easier to fix up the article, address the review comments, and then renominate it at WP:GAN. Either way, there are still several outstanding points from the original review that haven't been addressed, and failure to do so means that the article still doesn't meet the standards for sources, referencing and research. Imzadi 1979 → 22:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]