User talk:Imboredsenseless

I've seen others have a talk page, so I guess this is my way of creating one

You shouldn't post to the SPI

As I said, I think you have used another account, but I think if that is the case then your main account should not be blocked. Whether I am right or not, a CU being performed is in your best interest: if I am wrong, you will be vindicated; if I am right, then your main account probably won't be blocked. The worst possible outcome of the SPI from your point of view would be the CU request being rejected but your account being blocked based on the suspicious behaviour. And in my experience the more words that appear on an SPI the less likely a clerk is to endorse a CU request. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Also, weren't you pinged? If SPIs work the way I remember, Noticed Hijiri88 had posted here as I was awaiting his response isn't very credible. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

I was checking to see if you were online by your posts. Since you have dealt with him, do you think RJensen has edited with a Christian fundamentalist viewpoint on here? Imboredsenseless (talk) 11:41, 14 November 2016 2016 (UTC)

No, that's not the point. You should have received a notification when the SPI was opened in the first place, so your checking my contribs shouldn't have been necessary. And if you weren't pinged, it is confusing why you would click on the page I was editing and read it when you weren't named in the edit summaries.

Anyway, as I told you on my talk page, I haven't noticed any specifically Christian fundamentalist edits in my (very limited) interactions with Rjensen. I will look for them, though: your concern is indeed valid.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)