User talk:Imbecilesrus

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Imbecilesrus, suggests shared use and also that you are WP:NOT HERE to improve the encyclopedia.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Your requested new username cannot already be in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice.

-- The Anome (talk) 10:51, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Imbecilesrus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This username does not imply shared use beyond a reasonable doubt, and to say that it is is simply reading too much into a completely harmless username. Additionally, though I am an infrequent editor, the edits I have made have clearly been made with the intent of improving the encyclopedia, and I have no history of disruptive editing on Wikipedia. I was blocked without warning for a nugatory perceived infraction of Wikipedia policy. This action is not justified.

Accept reason:

While, as I note, this could have been handled better on your side, I am inclined to agree that the evidence for a problematic username is by no means clear and should definitely not have led directly to a block. Best of luck editing, Nosebagbear (talk) 08:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Anome: it's not the warmest of appeals, with a hint of wikilawyering about it, I know, but I was going to ask for some additional detail on a) why the username is believed to be shared b) if there is any editing history beyond purely the username that suggests NOTHERE editing? Nosebagbear (talk) 19:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It could be the "us" in the username. 331dot (talk) 07:13, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd really hope that's not the reasoning - the username to me is a fairly clear "imbecile/dinosaur" blur rather than "Imbeciles R us" vibe. I generally go with 3 day waits, so I'll give Anome till the 12th, since they've not edited since just before my ping. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:25, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]