User talk:Im ben online

Welcome!

Hi Im ben online! I noticed your contributions to Australian Greens and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Firefangledfeathers (talk) 05:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 05:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hynes

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Bill Hynes. All content for a living person must be reliably and independently sourced. Simply saying "X is not factual" and removing content that is sourced is not permitted and sourced listed have nothing to do with your claims. What someone says is not a matter of truth or law. If you keep doing this. You will be reported for vandalism of the page. Spdrcr19 (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure what you mean, I didn’t remove anything, I added criminal charges he’s been found guilty of. They’re fully referenced, it’s not an opinion. 115.64.227.248 (talk) 23:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. He was NOT found guilty of anything. Learn the laws in America before you post wrong information. It’s not factual and malicious on your part. Spdrcr19 (talk) 00:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

once again. You keep vandalizing the page. He was never found guilty of anything. You keep stating lies. Give up your obsession with trying to spread lies. You have been reported. Spdrcr19 (talk) 08:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'Good faith' editing is not vandalism. The article dispute is now on the Talk page of Bill Hynes. David notMD (talk) 12:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im Ben line did not make good faith edits. Saying someone was found guilty of something when in fact they were not.

1. He was not found guilty.

2. He did not admit guilt

3. He maintains his innocence

this person purposely put non factual information and edited the words to fit his narrative Their is a distinct difference between being found guilty and a no contest plea Spdrcr19 (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im brn online edited the article twice in March and not since. Any dispute about article content belongs on the Talk page of the article. Not here and not at Teahouse. David notMD (talk) 15:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]