User talk:Ilmari Karonen/archives/3

Thanks

Thanks for correcting my userpage with the javascript. My userboxes were messed up, and you didn't vandalize me or anything. Thanks again. Stallions2010 22:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing my UN userbox. Slick move with the JavaScript. —chair lunch dinner™ (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems as if your talk page is filling up fast on this topic, but thanks for helping fix up my user page. I would have done it my self if I had been warned that it was going to happen, but thanks --T-rex 00:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks here too. VodkaJazz 21:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to say thanks as well. - Square pear 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalizing my userpage!

~~Don't touch MY userpage. --UVnet 12:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

Sorry about that. I thought you deleted my userboxes.
What you did is you replaced the already deleted ones with non template versions right? --UVnet 13:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You will continue fixing boxes on my page right? --UVnet 14:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will, unless someone else is faster. Don't worry about that. :-) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Czech composers

Hi Ilmari, tx again for your bold step on the Dvořák issue. I come here to ask you an additional favour: also for Leoš Janáček article naming/categorisation was left in a comparable "hybrid" state, see Category:Compositions by Leos Janacek and Category:Operas by Leos Janacek. Could you kick off the bot on an update of the names of these categories too? I don't know how one gets started with that?

As far as composers are concerned as far as I checked all others are "consistent" per description in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (standard letters with diacritics)#Being consistent - but if you still see any others, please proceed, or send me a note, I'll try to occupy myself with it. --Francis Schonken 15:59, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another thankyou

Thanks muchly for fixing my userboxes :D I might start using subst: on them since so many keep getting deleted Modest Genius 22:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grave error with atheist userbox

Thank you very much for the help with fixing up so many user pages, but a mistake has occurred spanning hundreds of userpages in substing the {{user atheist}} userbox based on the unpopular, poorly-designed, and inaccurate out-of-process template recreation which had the Image:No_god.PNG on it, and the highly popular and correct version of the template which was actually being used by those almost-250 users prior to its deletion. If you have a way to access the version of the template from two deletes ago (before it was recreated out-of-process with the imaged version and subsequently respeedied), I strongly recommend replacing all the pages using the subst'd template with the previous, blue-tinted and image-less version as soon as possible. -Silence 23:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template-substitution

I appreciate that you replaced those 'templates' with their respective images, Mr. Karonen.--Anglius 04:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I imagine that you get a lot of thank-yous so I'll make this short. Thanks for your editing on my page. -Damien Vryce 18:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work

Hey, nice work you did on Srikeit's page. I think you just need to go there and check out the mess you have created ;) --Andy123 21:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything wrong with that page, other than that he's trying to put his userboxes in more columns than will fit on my screen, but it was that way before I ever touched it. Don't get me wrong, I'd be glad to help, if I just knew what the problem was. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion, the layout needs to conform to a 3-userbox-per-line sort of thing and it would look fine. That's how mine look. I'm going to attempt to 'prettify' his layout. If I get it right, you'll soon find out. - File:Ottawa flag.png

nath a nrdotcom ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 04:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Featured picture candidate

I have nominated a picture you have edited on commons, Image:Pregnancy.gif, as a featured picture candidate. The nomination is at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pregnancy.gif. --Pkchan 12:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts

Thank you for your efforts at fixing the photo at the Opus Dei article. Rodii was able to finally fix it. Again, thanks to you too for trying. Marax 02:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hanko panorama

OK, thanks for the offer - it will be interesting to see what you can do. The original images are here (note that the numerical order is "broken", and goes from right to left, starting at the # mark - but this is the order I'd prefer, due south in the middle of the panorama):

[[Image:STG 0981.JPG|50px]] . . . [[Image:STH 0982.JPG|50px]]

Terveisin, --Janke | Talk 06:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I removed the images themselves, since I have speedied them as "orphans". --Janke | Talk 10:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helsset

Buorre beaivvi! Ma ei räägi saame keelt, mutta kyllä minusta näyttää hyvinkin siltä, että Helsingin saamenkielinen nimi on Helsset. Googlella siitä löytyy 254 osumaa, joista ainakin ensimmäisissä puhutaan Helsingistä, ja itse artikkelissakin on linkki saamenkieliseen artikkeliin se:Helsset. JIP | Talk 18:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]