User talk:Illustr
January 2014
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Tetrahedron has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tetrahedron was changed by Illustr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868087 on 2014-01-23T18:41:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of 2014 FIFA World Cup controversies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 51/53/98/safetyregulations_e.pdf FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations] — see page 96, "g)"</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 FIFA World Cup Group H may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 51/53/98/safetyregulations_e.pdf FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations] — see page 96, "g)"</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:02, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop changing the results table (and making a bit of a mess of it). It's a standard method of presenting election results (see e.g. Slovenian presidential election, 2017#Results or South Ossetian presidential election, 2017#Results). As I responded on the talk page, it's a total of the cells above, so the total number of votes cast and the total of the percentages. Cheers, Number 57 10:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Please, don't cite Wikipedia as a reliable source, I've learned arithmetic from books, not from Wikipedia. 5,148,141 was taken for 100 percent and percentages are counted from this number.Illustr (talk) 11:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)