User talk:Iinnels

September 2013

Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Miguel Nicolelis without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The material you removed is sourced, you need to discuss any further removal of content on the talk page. I am One of Many (talk) 21:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Miguel Nicolelis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I am One of Many (talk) 01:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miguel Nicolelis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I am One of Many (talk) 21:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am Iinnels (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC). I am not vandalizing Wikipedia, I am following it's orientations. The content I have removed is contentious material about living persons and is poorly sourced. According to the instructions of Wikipedia itself, such material must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful, which is exactly the case. The part I have been removing is the following: 'This work comes with its critics who state that there are flaws in their scientific methods and that there is lack of controls. They claim that some of the scientific claims are rendered "far-fetched at best." One researcher stated the work was similar to a "poor Hollywood science fiction script." [7]'. The two first sentence are not sourced, and the third one is clearly harmful, is not a scientific argument and make no contribution to any serious discussion about the matter. I opened a discussion section, please read it.Iinnels (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]