User talk:Iicatsii

Welcome!

Hello, Iicatsii, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
• How to edit a page and write a great article
• The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
• The handy Manual of Style
• And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 17:33, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Wikipedia:Wikiproject Horror/Collaboration of the month

Hi! I noticed your name on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Horror membership list and am writing to all members who have not voted for the Collaboration of the month. Today is the designated selection day to choose the collaboration, but we currently have a tie between the two articles receiving the most votes, John Carpenter and Dario Argento. I am hoping to remedy this by drumming up a few more votes. Note that by voting for any nominated article (not limited to these two) you are indicating your "commitment to support and aid in collaborating on that specific article if it is chosen," so please feel absolutely free to ignore this message if for any reason you don't wish or would not be able to participate.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

We have a winner!

You showed support for the horror collaboration of the month. This month John Carpenter was selected to be improved to good article or featured article status. We hope you can contribute.

--Fuhghettaboutit 12:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

WP:NPA

In light of the fact that you have zero proof of your accusation...[1], I refer you to WP:NPA.--MONGO 07:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I see...the facts are the facts of the case. What are you. I have a number of featured articles, 200 more that are at least stubs, and have made many excellent contributions here. If you want to insult me, that's fine, but do it here or on my talk page. All I am doing is defending myself against harassment and you show up and also insult me...so what does that make you?--MONGO 07:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I haven't insulted you, I stated that you could handle this case with a little more decorum and that several wikipedians have articles there (yes I have one too). I admire your merits, however I still believe you need to take a breather from this until it blows over. ~ IICATSII 07:59, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Then don't call me a wet hen, or think I'm lying when I state that I haven't been to their website to edit. I have alot of friends on wiki, and many here in my home town, so I know, since I have email of course and I do communicate, that some others have propbably been to that website and edited articles there. I checked the editing history on the article about me and a number of the blankings were done by people that also blanked a lot of other pages there at the same time.--MONGO 08:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I didn’t call you a “wet hen”, I used a metaphor “running round like a wet hen” in that it seems that you’re using a lot of energy it deleting links to the main page of the article in question. As for calling you a liar for editing your own article, if you can show me a link to where I’ve stated this then I’ll happily apologise. ~ IICATSII 08:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

if you have a minute

I'm hitting a couple people I've interacted with in the past with this note, looking for input. Could I persuade you to take a cruising pass at it, or at least leave me a note of your thoughts on, my project? Timeline of Internet conflicts.

For what its worth, my notes on what I envision the growth of that page as/scope is on the talk page. Basically a factual chronology of the online conflicts that shape the internet and its growth, ala how someone may do a break down of real world physical wars (which I actually would like to do after as a project if it hasn't been). Anywho, let me know what you think if you get a chance. rootology 23:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Enable email or email me

Can you enable email? I'd like to send you a message. Thanks, Karwynn (talk) 22:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

You've got mail! Karwynn (talk) 22:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Aliendead.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aliendead.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Boyeatsgirl.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Boyeatsgirl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Streettrash.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Streettrash.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zombie honeymoon 2004 poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zombie honeymoon 2004 poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frankenhooker.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frankenhooker.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror needs your help

Iicatsii : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Giovanni Lombardo Radice, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Giovanni Lombardo Radice" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Giovanni Lombardo Radice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giovanni Lombardo Radice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni Lombardo Radice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Quis separabit? 17:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)