User talk:Ihtisham001
May 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Count Count. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. coinweber.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com is not a reliable source Count Count (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Once more: This website is not a reliable source. Stop using it in a citation. --Count Count (talk) 09:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- why you don't consider this website a reliable source? Ihtisham001 (talk) 09:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is a not notable news site, see WP:RSSELF. Also see WP:COI as you obviously have a conflict of interest being the blog author. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting your website. Count Count (talk) 10:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- you give my link to bloomberg just because it is a notable news site, news are same everywhere you give contribution to bloomberg as coinweber.com also write about it. Ihtisham001 (talk) 10:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- who says I am promoting website, I am just contributing to wikipedia and nothing else and wikipedia require the refference so I add it. Ihtisham001 (talk) 10:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Bloomberg is a highly reputable news organization with an editorial board. Coinweber does not compare. If you are not promoting this site then you won't have a problem using reliable sources for your additions, such as Bloomberg. Count Count (talk) 10:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have a problem, you should remove it the day I add the addition whyyou remove today after 10 days. Ihtisham001 (talk) 11:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- And if someone promoting their whats wrong with it if he or she provide a value to the platform and last but the least bloomberg at once also a startup, you guys have to support new startup they provide value to the platform. Ihtisham001 (talk) 11:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Read WP:REFSPAM to see what is wrong with it. And no, we do not have to support new startups. The only goal of Wikipedia is to build a high-quality encyclopedia. Count Count (talk) 11:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Bloomberg is a highly reputable news organization with an editorial board. Coinweber does not compare. If you are not promoting this site then you won't have a problem using reliable sources for your additions, such as Bloomberg. Count Count (talk) 10:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- who says I am promoting website, I am just contributing to wikipedia and nothing else and wikipedia require the refference so I add it. Ihtisham001 (talk) 10:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- you give my link to bloomberg just because it is a notable news site, news are same everywhere you give contribution to bloomberg as coinweber.com also write about it. Ihtisham001 (talk) 10:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is a not notable news site, see WP:RSSELF. Also see WP:COI as you obviously have a conflict of interest being the blog author. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting your website. Count Count (talk) 10:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- why you don't consider this website a reliable source? Ihtisham001 (talk) 09:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)