User talk:Ignium

Welcome

Hello, Ignium, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- PBS (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Historical revisionism (negationism)

On Talk:Historical revisionism (negationism) you wrote "But I can´t edit" (Revision as of 20:06, 6 October 2009). What do you mean? -- PBS (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some strange problem of my PC :S I will correct the link. Sorry :?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ignium (talk • contribs) 04:40, 17 October 2009

I asked that question because there is an editor who is restricted from editing the page who has used socket puppets in the past and to date you have only edited that page and your user pages.

Following on from that, I checked the article es:Negacionismo and for es:Usuario:Ignium, AFAICT you have not edited the page unless you used an IP address, so why the interest in the English language version?

On the page Talk:Historical revisionism (negationism) You have stated that "Im from Argentina". Have you been contributing to the talk page from Argentina? If your underlying IP address is an Argentinian IP address then it is very unlikely that you are a sock-puppet of the above mentioned restricted user. -- PBS (talk) 10:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Spanish Wikipedia the distinction between "Revisionism" and "Negationism" is quite clear. The English wiki is a lot more complete, so I use both. When I came here in the search of more info, I fall in the confusion that was exposed years ago.

Revisionism, in my country, was a fenomenum that efectively turns the facts of the Oficial Hístory. So this confusion would have taken 100 years of our history.

BTW. I do a litle edit in this article. I don´t know what happened last time.

¿Working in the Spanish Wiki? Im a cuasi-engineer, not a historian. But what I found here is a conceptual mistake that only needs logic. On the other hand, I do some apports in other kind of articles.

Are you contributing to Wikipedia from Argentina? -- PBS (talk) 15:21, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhh. Yes! I thinked that you refered to "Spanish" concept, What can I do for prove It?, but there is no proof. --Ignium (talk) 15:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We work on the assumption of good faith, so I believe you, you do not have to prove it. -- PBS (talk) 15:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Argentinian history is not quite so clear cut see for example Genocides in history#Argentina and Genocides in history#Dirty War in Argentina. -- PBS (talk) 15:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The classic revisionism goes from the colonization to 1945, specially in IXX century.

What happened in 70´s is not a concluded chapter of our history so, if doesn´t exist practically an oficial history, much less revicionist works.

Ahh, I read the article. The Oficial Hístory negates that genocide, is the inverse of what happened with the Holocaust. --Ignium (talk) 15:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying user about missing file description(s) (bot - disable)

File:Unidosxingenieria.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Unidosxingenieria.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidosxingenieria.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Unidosxingenieria.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 19:19, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]