User talk:IfAnimalsCouldTalk

Welcome!

Hello, IfAnimalsCouldTalk!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Apocheir (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm The person who loves reading. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Javan rhinoceros, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The person who loves reading (talk) 01:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oxpecker. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Oxpecker was changed by IfAnimalsCouldTalk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935646 on 2023-04-06T13:07:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Oxpecker, you may be blocked from editing. Technopat (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Utica Zoo. Technopat (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell if you were really intentionally disruptive or if you tried to do something but just refused to follow any of our guidelines and policies, or to respond to other editors' concerns. Drmies (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]