User talk:Ieditpagesmhm
ANI for uncivil comments
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GraziePrego (talk) 03:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Speaker Knockerz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 12:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)- The guy was abusing his power on Wikipedia for absolutely no reason, yet he's not banned but I am for being reasonable annoyed? On top of that, not one thing I said was actually a direct personal attack towards him. Ieditpagesmhm (talk) 18:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- You sure about no personal attacks? GraziePrego (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hundred percent mate, made a few jokes since the guy was clearly being difficult for no reason, abusing your power on Wikipedia is crazy, and so is saying that video evidence of someone saying something isn't a reliable source. I added a good bit of information, it was taken down for no reason because of no source, I added the source and he still took it down. I made a few jokes and they were well deserved, I don't see him facing any punishment. Ieditpagesmhm (talk) 04:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- “Taken down for no reason because of no source” so there was a reason for it being taken down? Also I don’t think you’ve really understood why you’ve been blocked- you started unloading insults on another editor when it was you who was in the wrong. You added info with no source, and that was correctly removed. You then added a source that doesn’t fit Wikipedia policy for a reliable source, so it was removed again. A combination of repeatedly editing incorrectly AND heaping abuse on your fellow editors is an easy recipe for being banned. GraziePrego (talk) 10:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I provided the YouTube channel where his mom directly said it herself. If he's gonna be so uptight and not let that slide then that's side mate, get a girlfriend and whilst you're at it, start actually banning people who abuse their power. Saying video evidence isn't a source quite literally is brain dead behaviour - whether in it's your little rulebook or not. Ieditpagesmhm (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- The “little rulebook” is simply the rules of how Wikipedia is collaboratively written. If you’re not interested in following the rules, find something else to do. Wikipedia is a rules-based project. GraziePrego (talk) 13:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- I provided the YouTube channel where his mom directly said it herself. If he's gonna be so uptight and not let that slide then that's side mate, get a girlfriend and whilst you're at it, start actually banning people who abuse their power. Saying video evidence isn't a source quite literally is brain dead behaviour - whether in it's your little rulebook or not. Ieditpagesmhm (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- “Taken down for no reason because of no source” so there was a reason for it being taken down? Also I don’t think you’ve really understood why you’ve been blocked- you started unloading insults on another editor when it was you who was in the wrong. You added info with no source, and that was correctly removed. You then added a source that doesn’t fit Wikipedia policy for a reliable source, so it was removed again. A combination of repeatedly editing incorrectly AND heaping abuse on your fellow editors is an easy recipe for being banned. GraziePrego (talk) 10:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I said he was acting like he was brain dead, banning me from editing anything ever again for saying that is purely pathetic. Sorry for not being Disney enough towards a guy who was clearly abusing his power. Ieditpagesmhm (talk) 04:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Seriously, go play a game or get a girlfriend. Ieditpagesmhm (talk) 04:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hundred percent mate, made a few jokes since the guy was clearly being difficult for no reason, abusing your power on Wikipedia is crazy, and so is saying that video evidence of someone saying something isn't a reliable source. I added a good bit of information, it was taken down for no reason because of no source, I added the source and he still took it down. I made a few jokes and they were well deserved, I don't see him facing any punishment. Ieditpagesmhm (talk) 04:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- You sure about no personal attacks? GraziePrego (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)