User talk:Ieagroup

Welcome!

Hello, Ieagroup, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 20 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Single-Handed Trans-Atlantic Race page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse reply

Hello, Ieagroup. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cordless Larry (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Ieagroup", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to be the name of a group or organisation, and suggests that more than one individual may have access to this account. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you.

 Yunshui ^雲_水 13:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user name IEAGROUP does not violate Wikipedia policy. It is the registered name of my company and I am the only person who has access to it or has knowledge of the password. It is the username I use for a number of accounts and it has never been a problem. I hope this satisfies your query.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 03:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ieagroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Attention of Orange Mike: I have very carefully gone through all of Wikipedia's rules and policies and in no way can I agree with you that my ID name of IEAGROUP represents a "group" in any way whatsoever. It DOES NOT represent an organization or anybody else and I have been using it as my Wikipedia login for almost 20 years with no problem. I have been using this as my personal ID for many private aspects of my life since long before Wikipedia even existed. I have been an occasional financial contributor to Wikipedia whenever I have been able to afford it as I believe in the principles portrayed by Wikipedia. I have often corrected mistakes I see other authors have made sometimes factual and sometimes typos. Like you, I am an elderly user of Wikipedia and when I see problems I report them. I am requesting that my ID be unblocked. Thank you. Michael Dodds Ieagroup (talk) 15:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First of all, your account is five years old; Wikipedia itself is no older than 15 or so. Secondly, I found this edit of yours illuminating. "[...] acting on behalf of The IEA Group in the United States who, under CEO Michael R. Dodds [...]" So this name does not represent the IEA Group? Seriously? Huon (talk) 16:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ieagroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator Huon I would like to correct an ambiguous statement made in a previous request relating to using IEAGROUP as my ID for Wikipedia, 20 years ago. What was intended was to say that this ID was originally generated back in the 80's and about 20 years ago I started using it as a personal ID for emails. I have no idea when I first started using it for Wikipedia so what I said is in fact not quite accurate. In the early to mid nineties the IEA Group under my control and it had a group of 5 executives including myself. Four of these executives are now dead and have been for some time and they never had access to my ID. I am the only person of that group left in existence. The IEA Group ceased to exist as a group after 1996 and any references to the IEA Group since, are purely relative to what I have done personally in the world since. On a login in March 2009 I corrected information that was published in Wikipedia relative to Zhoushan Airport, work that had been done in 1994-95. It is correct and accurate and is not promotional. You can look at other edits I have done in Wikipedia as IEAGROUP and you will find everything I have done has been in 100% compliance with Wikipedia's Policy and Rules and in particular I make absolutely certain that any edits are 100% correct and verifiable and there is never any conflict of interest. I hope this reassures you that my ID of IEAGROUP does not cover anybody else to use my ID neither does anyone else know my password. I am retired and certainly my Wikipedia ID is never used to propomote business and I have complete control of it at all times. I make a final request for you to unblock my access to Wikipedia. re Ieagroup (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have no reason to doubt that you are acting in good faith, and that what you say is true. However, your username is unacceptable for the following reasons

Wikipedia policy forbids "Usernames that unambiguously represent the name of a company, group, institution or product". Your name does unambiguously represent the name of a group, whether or not you are editing on behalf of that group, and whether or not the group still exists.
Wikipedia policy forbids "Usernames implying shared use", which your username does, whether or not the implication of shared use is accurate.
If, as you suggest, your account does not in fact represent a group, then it is a misleading username, as it gives the false impression that the account does so.

I fully appreciate that it must seem annoying and arbitrary that you are suddenly required to change username that you have used for years, but the fact is that as long as you were editing only occasionally, your username did not come to the attention of administrtaors. Now that it has come to our attention, it is clear that the username is contrary to Wikipedia's naming policy, and you cannot continue to use it. (If you wish to keep the reference to "Ieagroup", you may request a username which includes a reference to the group, while making it clear that the account is for an individual,such as "Fred of Ieagroup".) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Conflict of interest

I see that, contrary to what you appear to suggest above, several of your edits to articles have related to your company, and those edits cannot reasonably be regarded merely as "corrections" to existing content, as you added completely new content. For example, in this edit you added content about the IEA Group, which was not previously mentioned in the article at all; this edit did the same in another article; this edit added additional content relating to the "group", quite unlike anything previously mentioned. It is clear that at best you have, contrary to what you have said above, been editing with a conflict of interest, and really it is difficult to see those edits as anything other than an attempt to use Wikipedia to publicise the work of the group. Whether the group still exists or not, editing to promote or publicise anything or anyone is contrary to Wikipedia policy. If you make another unblock request, please make it clear that in future you will not edit in that way, as well as offering to change to a username which complies with Wikipedia policy. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]