User talk:Idrawrobots
December 2017
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Black flying fox has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Black flying fox was changed by Idrawrobots (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957946 on 2017-12-27T01:55:09+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Sweet Baby Inc.. Thank you. ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 21:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 00:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Leave me alone please. I don't appreciate the harassment. Idrawrobots (talk) 17:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's a mandatory notification based on your decision to edit in a contentious topic area; not harassment. This is a user talk page, it is expected that you will receive notifications and communication from other editors here. Per our guidelines on user talk pages:
a user cannot avoid administrator attention or notices and communications that policies or guidelines require to be posted merely by demanding their talk page not be posted to.
Please do not blame others for the foreseeable result of your actions, rather please assume good faith and do not cast aspersions about the motivations of other editors. ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 18:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's a mandatory notification based on your decision to edit in a contentious topic area; not harassment. This is a user talk page, it is expected that you will receive notifications and communication from other editors here. Per our guidelines on user talk pages: