User talk:Idmrks1
Idmrks1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Well, all I can say is that I'm sorry for having made multiple accounts and that I won't do it again. It's been almost 1 month since I'm blocked, and I would like to contribute to the encyclopedia. A new start would be appreciated.
Decline reason:
To be unblocked you're going to need to explain why you created all these sockpuppet accounts, what you intend to work on and how you'll avoid problems. Please also see WP:STANDARDOFFER. Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Idmrks1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I created them most of the time because I didn't remember my old usernames, I just created an account so my IP would be hidden. I've never denied that these accounts were mine. I've only abused it once to make a little bit of vandalism, because I read the technique on the Internet and was curious to see if it worked, I'm seriously sorry about that. To stop making it, I simply won't create a new account, I'll choose one and stick with it, I have no reason to create other accounts. All I ask for is a new chance. I am aware that I was mistaken, and I want to improve my behavior on wikipedia.
Decline reason:
I see no reason to unblock you, especially since you were operating multiple accounts as recently as yesterday. If you want to request unblocking in six months, per the standard offer, you are welcome to do that. TNXMan 16:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Idmrks1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I just want to say that I did NOT abuse multiple accounts as early as yesterday, I haven't made any edit, I think I logged in an other account to talk, then I saw that this one was considered as my main and I logged into it. This remark was totally absurd, please put things in context before accusing me of anything. Let me also say that a six month block for what I did is also absurd, it's not like I've had any warning about that before, or any previous blocks, etc. I've took some time to read your own policies, and think that they are simply not respected in this block. I'm talking about WP:BLOCK#PREVENTATIVE : how is this block preventive? I am now aware that it's not allowed to use multiple accounts, and won't do it anymore, yet, I don't have the chance to prove it, which is all I ask for. Please, administrators, if you want to decline the request, be nice enough to explain clearly why the block is preventive, why I am a threat to Wikipedia and why my IP is blocked indefinitely (which should only be used in rare cases, according to your own policies). I would like an answer to all of these questions, with clear evidence of any affirmation that you make about me.
Decline reason:
You wrote a serious TL;DR, however the response to it is very simple: using multiple accounts to make edits like this is prohibited, and your claims that you did nothing bad with these socks sound ridiculous. Max Semenik (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Idmrks1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is the only "wrong" edit that I have made with 2 accounts (well those made that night), like I have stated earlier, and I'm sorry about it. My questions were not answered, and that previous admin lacked of respect (tl;dr, really?) towards me, which is dissapointing from such a great encyclopedia's admin. I want a clear evidence that this block is preventive (this is a rule from your own policies), and not a punishment (this is also in your policies), because like I said, I understand my mistake, and I won't do it again (see guise to appealing blocks, this is the thing to do); therefore, the block isn't necessary anymore. And I can't prove it unless you let me a chance to do it. I don't really care about the accounts honestly, the major concern is the indefinite IP block, which causes me trouble in my personal life and I want it to be resolved as soon as possible. I swear that I won't ever create sock puppets anymore, I won't cause any trouble to the encyclopedia, I seriously have a problem seeing why it is preventive. If I do it again, ban me forever, fine, but let me prove to you that I won't do it. Please read my message with good faith and try to take the right decision, ignore the fact that there have been denied requests above (which can influence) and explain me what to do to get my IP unblocked. Take your time and thank you for your support.
Decline reason:
The sheer number of sock accounts you have created makes it very difficult to trust anything you say. The block on your IP is to prevent you doing it again. If it is causing problems for you on real life then maybe next time you are contemplating being dishonest and sneaky you will more carefully consider your actions. You've already been directed to follow WP:OFFER, I suggest you take it. Every time you post here or create another account the timer is reset to zero, so come back six months from today, having made no edits of any kind under any identity on the interim, and you have a very good chance of being unblocked. Or keep doing what you are doing, lose access to this and all your other talk pages, get banned forever and become a long term abuser of Wikipedia who nobody will ever listen to or trust again. The choice is yours. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Sir, you didn't answer my questions. As for the "If it is causing problems for you on real life then maybe next time you are contemplating being dishonest and sneaky you will more carefully consider your actions", your own policies, as stated 10000 times, say that a block must be preventive and not a punishment + honestly, you don't have to teach me anything. I see no reason to respect Wikipedias policies, like the offer, if the administrators don't respect their own policies. This is senseless. Answer my questions, I won't leave until I have a serious answer. Idmrks1 (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC)