User talk:IdiotsOpposite

Classes of chemicals

First, welcome to Wikipedia. You will have fun here and help society too. Now in a more sober comment about your idea of classifying chemicals and your comment that you "I'm somewhat new to chemistry" I recommend against trying to organizing anything much. We deal with a variety of well intentioned folk anxiously - even desperately - trying to organize this and that, but unless an editor knows chemistry well, the efforts are often wasted or worse. We just survived a group of high school kids "organizing" geometry pages, and the effort was an embarrassment to them and to Wikipedia. Alternatively and more positively, there are many chemicals or specific concepts that you might find intriguing. These articles need new eyes who can dedicate their editing energies, learn some chem, and help identify jargon - generally help clarify themes for the public. Along the way you'll pick up a lot of knowledge and strength. But trying to broadly organize topics that you dont understand seems premature. Good luck and best wishes, --Smokefoot (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I wasn't quite sure about what your views were on that, and knowing me, I would've probably screwed it up somehow. However, are carbon suboxides of different lengths "different" enough to each have their own article? The carbon suboxide article we have now is a stub. Any article with a longer carbon suboxide will also likely be a stub. So, might it make more sense to create a "carbon suboxides" article, and then insert each carbon suboxide in sections in that article? Or perhaps a "carbon suboxides" article with links to each individual carbon suboxide... hmm...--IdiotsOpposite (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have advice about pet-projects - we all have favorites. I was just warning you off of any kind of broad or organizational effort. From my limited knowledge of the carbon suboxides, they are kind of curiosities except in flames and the interstellar medium. There is this thing Dicarbon monoxide - which I think tickled the fancy of astrochem enthusiasts. About your tendency to screw things up, welcome to the club. But screwing up on an individual article is rectifiable because someone will tell you, usually nicely, sometimes in kind of surly language. I'd avoid chemicals and topics that are extremely obscure (we will never have an article on 1-propyl-2-ethyl-3-methylbenzene and x million others). You can always write your thing and then seek advice on the chemicals page as you have been doing. I recommend starting with small edits. --Smokefoot (talk) 02:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the inspiration regarding the mercenaries section for Rhye's and Fall. You are the only person so far to respond to something I have said. Once again, thanks. Willbat (talk) 00:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!