Jump to content

User talk:Idea8623/sandbox/Exari Systems

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copied from Talk:Exari

[edit]

Most references are useless to establish notability

[edit]

I checked out the references as they existed at 21:13, 1 October 2013.

Here's what I found:

  • ijlit - seems okay, paywalled, only used to site basic info and that the company "was participant in the LegalXML eContracts ... standardization process"
  • iaccm, isda, lloyds, law.standford - no mention or trivial mention
  • patentscope - primary, non-independent, BUT suitable for verifying patent claim
  • vermontlaw - a paragraph about how this company is collaborating with the university, primary, not competely independent
  • xerlin - primary, non-independent
  • kmworld - Decent writeup of InsuranceAccelerator, part of an interview with an Exari client that uses this product. Note: This is an industry-specific web site.
  • informationweek - similar but broader. BUT is appears to be a slight rewrite of the press release http://www.exari.com/News/Media-Releases/HDI-Gerling-Insurance-Licenses-Exari.html from the day before.
  • araggroup - based on press release at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/04/prweb5229014.htm from the day before.
  • reuters - a press release

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The sources in question

[edit]

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Idea8623/sandbox/Exari_Systems&oldid=575346019"