User talk:Iconmike2007

Little context in Mike's Dead To Rights

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mike's Dead To Rights, by Stormbay (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mike's Dead To Rights is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mike's Dead To Rights, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Godfather Of The Ghetto

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Godfather Of The Ghetto. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godfather Of The Ghetto. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Get Up (50 Cent song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. HamburgerRadio (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait until albums are actually released before creating articles on them. Enigma^msg 05:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Game - Ain't No Doubt About It

Everyone in the world knows ANDAI is going to be no where near the RED album. The references you post about the track are at least a year old. If you've been keeping up with news and all that, you'll see that Game had essentially scrapped what RED album was when he was talking about ANDAI winning grammys, when he put out Big Money, Krazy, all those tracks. But as you can see, other people agree with me because ANDAI was removed again. The fact you really believe it was going to be on the album brings a tear to my eye. Have you not listened to the track? (Highbird2010 (talk) 04:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Detox

Under pressure has its own article. It SHOULD NOT be given precedence in the Detox article as Dre has specifically said the only reason it was released was because it leaked early. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thus it was not released in promotion of detox — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]