User talk:Icesnowgeorge

Welcome!

Hi Icesnowgeorge! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jacona (talk) 16:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Icesnowgeorge. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page INVNT Group, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies:I do not have a conflict of interest. This is a company I am familiar with from my line of work. I was actually surprised that they didn’t have a page so I decided to help out. I hope my work would be appreciated. I have done my best to comply with wiki policies. Could you tell me why you have removed the awards?? Lots of companies have an award section. Is there a policy regarding including them? Icesnowgeorge (talk) 17:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes: content should be sourced to reliable secondary sources. Did you put that section in there? Because most of them were sourced to the company website, if I remember correctly. Of course many such articles have such sections, because many such articles are written by the companies themselves or people they paid, and they want to look good. But awards have to be meaningful, not inside jobs or plums companies hand out to each other, and secondary sourcing is one thing that can help make some award noteworthy. But these awards really should be notable themselves (meaning, have an article)--that's how we do it in K-pop, for instance. So solid secondary sourcing is really a bare minimum, but not necessarily sufficient. Drmies (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of INVNT Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article INVNT Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INVNT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Local Variable (talk) 00:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of INVNT Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article INVNT Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INVNT Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TLA^tlak 16:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Marketing companies established in 2020

A tag has been placed on Category:Marketing companies established in 2020 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Business services companies established in 2020

A tag has been placed on Category:Business services companies established in 2020 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]