User talk:Icebear244

Guys, shouldn't the pilot be featured in the series overview for We Bare Bears' episode list page?Icebear244 (talk) 00:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Icebear244, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Icebear244! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Color changes in tables

Please STOP changing the colors in tables without giving a valid reason for doing so (as is the case here), or for arbitrary reasons/reasons that make no sense (such as matching up with the colors of characters or "I like the color"). Also, please take some time to read and go over WP:COLOR - I noticed that at least one of your color changes may not meet Wikipedia's accessibility requirements for the colorblind. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 16:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I'm new here, I've only been editing for 3 days, give me a break.

Additionally, I strongly suggest that you discuss the changes with other editors on the articles' talk pages. Wikipedia is a community-based project, and discussing potentially controversial changes with other editors is strongly encouraged. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 17:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to User talk:Electricburst1996 while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 20:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Powerpuff Girls (2016 TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 20:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did have a reason, I just forgot to put it, the TTG/PPG crossover is NOT a stand-alone special for both shows, it's Season 3, Episode 40 of TTG. Icebear244 (talk)Icebear 244Icebear244 (talk)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Amazing World of Gumball (season 3) into The Amazing World of Gumball (season 5). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Icebear244. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ben 10 (2016)

Do you have any evidence that the episode you added to the page is real? If so, please post it here. http://ben10.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Upload PassportPortpass (talk) 12:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COLOR

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of CatDog episodes, contributed colours that may cause accessibility problems for users with certain types of visual disabilities. We aim to use colours that meet the WCAG AAA standard for accessibility. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines on this subject, which can be found at WP:COLOR; this page provides further information about contributing AAA-compliant colours to this encyclopedia. For information specific to templates used in articles about television, please also see Template talk:Infobox television season/Archive 3. If you only meant to experiment, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Removed "Season 4"

Please refer to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

If no reliable sources exist for creating this supposed "Season 4," it should not be created

Rubyaxles (talk) 16:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Icebear244. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Noah Kastin. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 06:59, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:List of OK K.O.! Let's Be Heroes episodes#Ep53 "You're in Control" is a single episode

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of OK K.O.! Let's Be Heroes episodes#Ep53 "You're in Control" is a single episode. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Lego Ninjago Movie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to source that Warner Animation Group is one of the production companies, it's pretty obvious. Also the previous edit before mine listed Warner Bros Pictures twice as both a distributor and a production company. If the other WAG movie pages have Warner Animation Group listed as one of the production companies, why can't Ninjago? It makes no sense. Icebear244 (talk) 20:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Icebear244[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Icebear244. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Transformers television series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syndication (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Dora the Explorer episodes, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 00:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary here is not helpful, it can be seen at Talk:Zionism#Apropos this revert and accompanying threat, the consensus is clearly against you. By all means, discuss at talk page, start an RFC or something else but please do not make idle threats with no basis. Selfstudier (talk) 15:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hello, I see you are taking part in the disruptive pov-pushing on Zionism. No, you are the ones who should start an RFC, as you guys are restoring controversial content again and again, insult others and force them to accept your edits. This behavior is unacceptable and needs to be addressed promptly. Icebear244 (talk) 15:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]