User talk:Ibrahim888

Welcome

Hello, Ibrahim888, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Altered Walter (talk) 10:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Ibrahim888, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Ibrahim888! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ibrahim888. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 12:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bahrain (historical region) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Al Ahsa and Al-Ahsa

Uyunid dynasty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rabia and Ahsa

Al Ghardaqa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rabia

Ali bin al Mugrab Al Uyuni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ahsa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Uyunid dynasty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 16:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your English

I don't know if you have anyone who can help you with this, but some of the article doesn't make sense. What does " (Rabia ibn Nizar bin Contagious Adna" mean for instance? Or "Straddle the influence of this state in Al-Ahsa, Qatif and the island of Bahrain was starting rule of (467 AH / 1074 AD) and continued until (636 AH / 1238 AD) almost, where he witnessed the history of the region one of the big countries, which lasted for one hundred and sixty years"? That also makes no sense. Is this a web translation of an article in another language? More points - see also sections point only to articles on this Wikipedia. External links should normally be in English and need to comply with WP:EL. Dougweller (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bahrain (historical region) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Al Ahsa

Bahrani people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Al Ahsa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uyunid dynasty

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Uyunid dynasty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. I understand why you are making these edits, but you need to stay away from the article for a little bit or you will end up blocked. Dougweller (talk) 15:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

His last edits didn't seem to make a major change, have I missed anything? Dougweller (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. I have not done anything since my last edid. I'm a little confused on what I have done.

Alright.. I understand. Thank you. Ibrahim888 (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abdullah bin Ali Al Uyuni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Liwa and Persians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello, I noticed that all of your edits are marked as minor and that your edit summaries are four tildes (~~~~). I think you should take time to read WP:edit summary and WP:minor in order to better understand the issue here. In short, your edit summary should give an idea about your edit and why you made it, and you should only mark small edits as minor, not massive expansions. Have a nice day! Mohamed CJ (talk) 08:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, Thank you, you too.Ibrahim888 (talk) 08:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think it would be very helpful if you clicked on "Show preview" before saving your edits; it gives you an idea about the change you're about to make and allows you to tweak your edit further before it becomes visible to everyone else. Mohamed CJ (talk) 08:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great idea, I shall try to do that from today! Thank you for the help, Much appreciated. Ibrahim888 (talk) 08:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Uyunid dynasty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hakim and Rabia

Abdullah bin Ali Al Uyuni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hakim

Uyunid Emirate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hakim

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 20 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the History of Bahrain page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ibrahim888. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently removed content from House of Al-Falasi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to House of Al-Falasi, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ibrahim888. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ibrahim888. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Ghardaqa

The article Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Ghardaqa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Al Ghardaqa

The article Al Ghardaqa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability. Only one source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Ghardaqa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Ghardaqa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Ghardaqa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thepharoah17 (talk) 00:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ali bin al Mugrab Al Uyuni

The article Ali bin al Mugrab Al Uyuni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Google translated article. Lacks notability and sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Uyunid dynasty, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 09:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Al Ghardaqa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Al Ghardaqa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and no source in the article as presented is verifiable - the ISBNs are all invalid as is the DOI; the titles given for English sources return no results on search, leaving the current article effectively unsourced. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:11, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al Ghardaqa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Ghardaqa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Ghardaqa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hi Ibrahim888! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Ali bin al Mugrab Al Uyuni that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 11:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I note now that you have been notified about minor edits before[1] and that you have acknowledged that notification.[2] It is disruptive to continue to tag edits as minor after being advised that they are not. DrKay (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Prince Abdulaziz bin Muhammad Al Ghardaqa. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 11:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prince Abdulaziz bin Muhammad Al Ghardaqa

The article Prince Abdulaziz bin Muhammad Al Ghardaqa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible hoax. Sources do not exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKay (talk) 11:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]