User talk:Iask1

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Mongol invasions of Durdzuketi

added links pointing to Nogai, Oirat, Argun, Khan, Zafarnama and Shali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Chakhig is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Iask1 (talk) 06:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Iask1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, User:Bbb23 I am writing to request the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, which was recently suspended due to accusation of sockpupping. I would like to emphasize that I take the allegation of sockpupping very seriously and would never engage in such behavior. The account that was accused of sockpupping with (User: Blasusususu) is a friend of mine, I collaborate with him outside of Wikipedia on messaging platforms. We work together on articles, and I understand why our shared interests and contributions may have raised some concerns. However, I assure you that I have never used multiple accounts to deceive or manipulate the system. Having read Wikipedia's policy on banning sockpuppets, I understand that editing an article with a friend to make it appear more legitimate is a reason for banning. However, I want to make it clear that my friend and I have never engaged in such behavior, and that we have never intended to deceive or manipulate the system in any way. We work together out of a common interest in writing accurate and informative articles. If the ban is justified, I humbly ask that it be lifted with the understanding that I will never again work on an article with my friend outside of Wikipedia. I'm prepared to offer any proof required to establish my innocence. I am aware that sockpuppetry is a serious issue on Wikipedia, and I am happy to discuss my editing history and behavior with anyone who has inquiries. I'm asking that the block be removed since I think it goes against Wikipedia's blocking guidelines. I have always interacted respectfully and constructively with other users on the site, and I have never purposefully broken any rules or community guidelines. I'm hoping you'll take my appeal into account and unban me. Iask1 (talk) 12:50 pm, 19 March 2023, Sunday (28 days ago) (UTC−5) Iask1 (talk) 12:51 pm, 19 March 2023, Sunday (2 months, 2 days ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

Absent any response from the original blocking admin, I'm inclined to accept on the basis of a clear intent to contribute in good faith and the absence of any significant disruption. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder of ban appeal

@Rosguill:

Hello Rosguill,

Thank you for reviewing my appeal and considering my intent to contribute in good faith. I appreciate your willingness to verify with the blocking admin for any additional evidence related to collusion or tendentious editing. If you have come to a conclusion, I would be grateful if you could kindly update me on the status of my appeal.

Once again, thank you for your time and consideration. Iask1 (talk) 22:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siege of Maghas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Maghas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Maghas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MaximumCruiser2 🚢 (talk) 17:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Maghas. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Your hoax "Siege of Maghas" has been deleted. MaximumCruiser2 🚢 (talk) 00:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]