User talk:Ianrs54

Welcome!

Hello, Ianrs54, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Battlegroup Modern and WWII rules., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! role^player 13:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battlegroup Modern and WWII rules.

The article Battlegroup Modern and WWII rules. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide or walkthrough

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. role^player 13:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've also noted that the article might be a copyright violation, as the wording makes it look very much as if it is copied from elsewhere. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]