User talk:Ianlee73

Welcome!

Hello, Ianlee73, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! As I said at the AfC help desk, your draft needs to show that the band has received significant coverage in reliable independent sources, both to establish that the band is notable enough for an article and to allow our readers to verify the article's content. I can't really help you find such sources; Google News came up empty. Huon (talk) 19:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huon,

Thank you. Below are some links to Order of the Beak:

http://discogs.com/artist/Order+Of+The+Beak

http://www.myspace.com/orderofthebeak

http://www.facebook.com/orderofthebeak

http://www.hikikomori-records.com

http://brainwashed.com/weddle/reviews/666.html

http://www.allmusic.com/album/release/invisible-route-666-mr0000356431/credits

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_Records

Ianlee73 (talk) 20:18, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ianlee73, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Ianlee73! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Order of the Beak.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LionMans Account (talk) 14:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

None of the links you mentioned would be considered WP:RS. Also, the sources should be in the article, although sites that are closely connected to the subject would not be used to consider notability. LionMans Account (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

advice about Order of the Beak

Sorry for the delay, I got confused about who was asking me about what.

The problem with this is very simple. You need references providing substantial coverage about them from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. The best references are reviews of their performances, but not just announcements. If you have them, ad them and ask for another review. If not, you can facilitate matters by placing at the top a line reading : {{db-author}}, and it will be quickly deleted.. When you have the necessary material, then try again. I do not want to discourage you, but to urge you to continue to contribute. DGG ( talk ) 05:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Order of the Beak concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Order of the Beak, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Order of the Beak

Hello Ianlee73. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Order of the Beak".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Order of the Beak}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]