User talk:Ian-turner77
Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at Shane Maguire. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Danski14 16:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Jude Law red carpet.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jude Law red carpet.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Final Destination 4.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Final Destination 4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Bring Back One Hit Wonders
[edit]A tag has been placed on Bring Back One Hit Wonders, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tikiwont 08:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- You have recently recreated or reposted material at Bring Back One Hit Wonders which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. JuJube 19:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Micheal Madsen With Vodka.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Micheal Madsen With Vodka.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Caine-michael-photo-michael-caine-6202250.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Caine-michael-photo-michael-caine-6202250.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
May 2007
[edit]
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Madsen. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Chriswiki 17:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Captives, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Captives is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Captives, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Little context in Resident Evil: Ressurection
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Resident Evil: Ressurection, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Resident Evil: Ressurection is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Resident Evil: Ressurection, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
Notability of Daniel Frederiksen
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Daniel Frederiksen, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Daniel Frederiksen seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Daniel Frederiksen, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Daniel Frederiksen itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Mr Orange At meeting.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Mr Orange At meeting.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Son of Tony
[edit]Please stop vandalizing Son of Tony. Just because it's on the way to deletion doesn't mean you can play around with it using fake information. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- I know the feeling, dude. These fake articles annoy me -- there was one called War a while ago, a supposed film by Kubrick that he made back in the day. Completely fake. It was deleted, thankfully. We just gotta let this article run its course, and it'll be gone from Wikipedia forever. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tracked down his contributions -- he made another fake film article at The Fast and the Furious: Top Gear. I'll keep an eye on him to make sure he doesn't do anything more. By the way, you should leave a signature with your comments. Type four tildes (~) at the end of your comment to leave your name and a timestamp. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: Superman
[edit]I would suggest against creating an article right now, because production for the sequel is still a long way off. Bryan Singer is currently filming Valkyrie. If you have new information, I would suggest adding it to Superman Returns#Sequel for the time being. I would also suggest looking here to see if the headlines there match what you found. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I am. I've helped with Iron Man (film) and The Dark Knight (film), so they're in pretty good shape. I'm looking forward to TDK, but I guess I don't know what to expect from Iron Man. Favreau isn't exactly a renowned director. By the way, when you respond on my talk page, just go to the bottom of it and click "edit" to leave another comment under the same section, instead of creating a new one. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's true about Elf, and in addition, Iron Man is just not as popular as Batman. It depends on how captivating they make the film, not to mention a good marketing campaign. I'll be seeing both, though. And don't forget The Incredible Hulk, being released in summer 2008 as well. Ed Norton as Bruce Banner, that's pretty good casting. And about leaving comments, make sure you leave a line of space between your comments so they can be seen separately. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:17, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
To be honest, I passed on the Fantastic Four films, as they did not get very good reviews, according to Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. I have too many other movies to watch (you can see some under my Status on my user page), and I have over 450+ titles on my Netflix queue. So Fantastic Four isn't a high priority for me. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Postalgermanposter min.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Postalgermanposter min.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:740796 keith allen150.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:740796 keith allen150.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:HayleyMills1.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:HayleyMills1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Inlaws.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Inlaws.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:AlanCarr.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:AlanCarr.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:AlanCarr.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:AlanCarr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. bluemask (talk) 05:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:AlanCarr.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:AlanCarr.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. bluemask (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:NickM.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:NickM.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:ObsCure II.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:ObsCure II.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Crash Twnsanity.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Crash Twnsanity.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Ziggy link
[edit]Why did you remove that link from the Big Brother 2007 housemates page? Dalejenkins | 22:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- That's not how things are done. Put {{subst:afdx}} at the top of the article and follow from there. Dalejenkins | 22:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
The Passion of the Christ 2 Crucify This!
[edit]This is a fake movie that appears in a Family Guy episode. There is no such movie being made, Mel Gibson is not making it, and James Caviezel is not starring in it. Please stop inserting references to it in the James Caviezel article. --Miskwito 23:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Friday Night with Jonathan Ross
[edit]The link i deleted was a dead link to a page that had already been deleted. Bencey 16:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
September 2007
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yogi Bear, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Melsaran (talk) 12:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Scary Movie 5 edits
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scary Movie 5, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Seriously dude, the Scary Movie articles are messed up enough as it is Cyclone49 01:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's okay Cyclone49 05:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Scary Movie 5 for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. Ward3001 21:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)